From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] clk: rockchip: disable init state before mmc card initialization
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:02:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DB23F8.1000704@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <120036049.vlT25D4un8@phil>
On 2015/8/24 18:01, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Am Montag, 24. August 2015, 16:27:43 schrieb Shawn Lin:
>> mmc host controller's IO input/output timing is unpredictable if
>> bootloader execute tuning for HS200 mode. It might make kernel failed
>> to initialize mmc card in identification mode. The root cause is
>> tuning phase and degree setting for HS200 mode in bootloader aren't
>> applicable to that of identification mode in kernel stage. Anyway, we
>> can't force all bootloaders to disable tuning phase and degree setting
>> before into kernel. Simply disable it in rockchip_clk_register_mmc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
>> b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c index e9f8df32..ae21592 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-mmc-phase.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ static unsigned long rockchip_mmc_recalc(struct clk_hw
>> *hw, #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DEGREE_MASK 0x3
>> #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_OFFSET 2
>> #define ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_MASK (0xff << ROCKCHIP_MMC_DELAYNUM_OFFSET)
>> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE (0x1)
>> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT (1)
>> +#define ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK (0x1)
>
> you don't need the "()" around primitive values. Also I don't think you need
> the second MASK attribute, doing
> writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
> ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
> mmc_clock->shift),
>
> should be enough. And thirdly I'm undecided about the naming of the constant.
> The manual describes the init_state as "Assert init_state to soft reset the
> CLKGEN.", so I guess I'd prefer
>
> ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_RESET
Thanks, Heiko.
Actually, I'm either not so sure how to naming this bit since if we are
used to calling a bit, reset bit, which I thought it should at least do
some reset either to state machine or to register value. But obvious it
doesn't. Moreover, Assert/Dis-assert seems like disable/enable from my
point. Anyway, ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_RESET is okay for me, but I think
I should add some comments for these code.
>
> or so
>
>>
>> #define PSECS_PER_SEC 1000000000000LL
>>
>> @@ -119,6 +122,21 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_mmc_clk_ops = {
>> .set_phase = rockchip_mmc_set_phase,
>> };
>>
>> +static void rockchip_clk_mmc_disable_init(struct rockchip_mmc_clock
>
> I guess similar to the thoughts above, simply name this
> rockchip_clk_mmc_reset()
>
> or alternatively just do the reset in rockchip_clk_register_mmc directly:
>
> if (mmc_clock->shift == ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT))
> writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
> ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK,
> mmc_clock->shift),
> mmc_clock->reg);
>
> as the pr_debug does not really serve a purpose.
>
Okay, rockchip_clk_mmc_reset is coming in v2 :)
>
> Heiko
>
>> *mmc_clock) +{
>> + if (mmc_clock->shift != ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_SHIFT)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + writel(HIWORD_UPDATE(ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_DISABLE,
>> + ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK,
>> + mmc_clock->shift),
>> + mmc_clock->reg);
>> +
>> + pr_debug("%s: clear mmc init state to %d", __func__,
>> + (readl(mmc_clock->reg) >> (mmc_clock->shift)) &
>> + ROCKCHIP_MMC_INIT_STATE_MASK);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char *name,
>> const char *const *parent_names, u8 num_parents,
>> void __iomem *reg, int shift)
>> @@ -139,6 +157,8 @@ struct clk *rockchip_clk_register_mmc(const char *name,
>> mmc_clock->reg = reg;
>> mmc_clock->shift = shift;
>>
>> + rockchip_clk_mmc_disable_init(mmc_clock);
>> +
>> if (name)
>> init.name = name;
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 8:27 [RESEND PATCH] clk: rockchip: disable init state before mmc card initialization Shawn Lin
2015-08-24 10:01 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-08-24 14:02 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DB23F8.1000704@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox