From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: If "count" including the terminating byte '\0' the write system call should retrun success.
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:24:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DB8B95.7050005@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824134408.be0ffaa654f7d26802119b81@linux-foundation.org>
This seems to be the relevant patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/5/104
Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com> 2010-05-05 02:26:45
00b7c3395aec3df43de5bd02a3c5a099ca51169f
+static const char proc_wspace_sep[] = { ' ', '\t', '\n' };
So since 2010 we have the current behavior.
Best regards
Heinrich Schuchardt
On 24.08.2015 22:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:33:58 +0800 Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Eric W. Biederman
>> <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On August 24, 2015 1:56:13 AM PDT, Sean Fu <fxinrong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> when the input argument "count" including the terminating byte "\0",
>>>> The write system call return EINVAL on proc file.
>>>> But it return success on regular file.
>>>
>>> Nonsense. It will write the '\0' to a regular file because it is just data.
>>>
>>> Integers in proc are more than data.
>>>
>>> So I see no justification for this change.
>> In fact, "write(fd, "1\0", 2)" on Integers proc file return success on
>> 2.6 kernel. I already tested it on 2.6.6.60 kernel.
>>
>> So, The latest behavior of "write(fd, "1\0", 2)" is different from old
>> kernel(2.6).
>> This maybe impact the compatibility of some user space program.
>
> 2.6 was a long time ago. If this behaviour change has happened in the
> last 1-2 kernel releases then there would be a case to consider making
> changes. But if the kernel has been this way for two years then it's
> too late to bother switching back to the old (and strange) behaviour.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 8:56 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl.c: If "count" including the terminating byte '\0' the write system call should retrun success Sean Fu
2015-08-24 12:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-24 15:33 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-24 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2015-08-24 21:24 ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2015-08-24 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25 0:57 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 2:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-25 7:50 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25 16:44 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 17:33 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-08-25 19:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-26 15:48 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-26 20:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-27 0:17 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-27 2:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-27 8:32 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-28 3:31 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-08 3:11 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-08 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-08 16:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-08 16:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-11 9:05 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-11 13:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-11 17:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-13 12:39 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-13 16:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-15 9:30 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-15 14:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-13 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 9:10 ` Sean Fu
2015-09-15 13:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-25 3:12 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-25 20:39 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2015-08-26 9:30 ` Sean Fu
2015-08-27 0:32 ` Sean Fu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DB8B95.7050005@gmx.de \
--to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=emunson@akamai.com \
--cc=fxinrong@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox