From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@micron.com>,
Asai Thambi SP <asamymuthupa@micron.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmilburn@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch|rfc] mtip32x: fix regression introduced by blk-mq per-hctx flush
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:36:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DCD1E7.8090006@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49fv3xihxz.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On 08/05/2015 02:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:
>
>> On 07/29/2015 08:22 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After commit f70ced091707 (blk-mq: support per-distpatch_queue flush
>>> machinery), the mtip32xx driver may oops upon module load due to walking
>>> off the end of an array in mtip_init_cmd. On initialization of the
>>> flush_rq, init_request is called with request_index >= the maximum queue
>>> depth the driver supports. For mtip32xx, this value is used to index
>>> into an array. What this means is that the driver will walk off the end
>>> of the array, and either oops or cause random memory corruption.
>>>
>>> The problem is easily reproduced by doing modprobe/rmmod of the mtip32xx
>>> driver in a loop. I can typically reproduce the problem in about 30
>>> seconds.
>>>
>>> Now, in the case of mtip32xx, it actually doesn't support flush/fua, so
>>> I think we can simply return without doing anything. In addition, no
>>> other mq-enabled driver does anything with the request_index passed into
>>> init_request(), so no other driver is affected. However, I'm not really
>>> sure what is expected of drivers. Ming, what did you envision drivers
>>> would do when initializing the flush requests?
>>
>> This is really a bug in the core, we should not have to work around
>> this in the driver. I'll take a look at this.
>
> Hi, Jens,
>
> Any update on this?
To avoid stalling further on this, I'll apply the simple fix for 4.2 so
we can move forward. It's a memory corruption issue and should get
fixed, we can argue details later.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-29 14:22 [patch|rfc] mtip32x: fix regression introduced by blk-mq per-hctx flush Jeff Moyer
2015-07-29 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-05 20:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-25 20:36 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-07-29 15:23 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DCD1E7.8090006@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asamymuthupa@micron.com \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=sbradshaw@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox