public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: "Singh, Brijeshkumar" <Brijeshkumar.Singh@amd.com>,
	"openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add of_device_id in MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:57:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DDD3E2.4090606@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D506FF644BBE48498B87295D58C770F820EBC8D6@satlexdag03.amd.com>

On 08/25/2015 09:50 AM, Singh, Brijeshkumar wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> Just tried the patch on 4.2-rc8 and it seem to build just fine
>
> * make x86_64_defconfig + enable IPMI module as "m"   - Build OK
> * make allyesconfig - Build OK
> * make allmodconfig - Build OK
>
> Please let me know if  I am missing something otherwise send me your config and will try to root cause the issue. 
> Optionally, if you are okay then I can guard  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipmi_match) changes with #if CONFIG_OF to ensure that code does not get build for non device-tree platform.

I have a patch queued that reworks the probing a bit, and it affected
this code.  I had to move the change into the CONFIG_OF ifdef and change
the name.  Sorry this took so long, I just didn't have time to look at it.

I have queued the change, and it will be in linux-next soon, if you want
to check it.

-corey

> -Brijesh 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:tcminyard@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Corey
>> Minyard
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 7:49 PM
>> To: Singh, Brijeshkumar; openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: add of_device_id in MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
>>
>> Well, I should have compile tested first.  On x86_64:
>>
>>
>>   CC [M]  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.o In file included from
>> ../drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:42:0:
>> ../drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:2804:25: error: 'ipmi_match'
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipmi_match);
>>                          ^
>> ../include/linux/module.h:223:21: note: in definition of macro
>> 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
>>  extern const typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table  \
>>                      ^
>> ../include/linux/module.h:223:27: error:
>> '__mod_of__ipmi_match_device_table' aliased to undefined symbol
>> 'ipmi_match'
>>  extern const typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table  \
>>                            ^
>> ../drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:2804:1: note: in expansion of macro
>> 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipmi_match);
>>
>>
>> This has to compile on all arches.  I'm not sure what is wrong, but I've removed
>> the patch.
>>
>> -corey
>>
>> On 08/24/2015 09:15 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>> Fix autoloading ipmi modules when using device tree.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijeshkumar.singh@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>> index 8a45e92..cddc7b0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>>> @@ -2785,6 +2785,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ipmi_driver = {
>>>  	.probe		= ipmi_probe,
>>>  	.remove		= ipmi_remove,
>>>  };
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipmi_match);
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARISC
>>>  static int ipmi_parisc_probe(struct parisc_device *dev)


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-26 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-24 14:15 [PATCH] ipmi: add of_device_id in MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE Brijesh Singh
2015-08-24 21:36 ` Corey Minyard
2015-08-25  0:48 ` Corey Minyard
2015-08-25  2:04   ` yalin wang
2015-08-25 11:59     ` Corey Minyard
2015-08-25 12:02       ` Singh, Brijeshkumar
2015-08-25 14:50   ` Singh, Brijeshkumar
2015-08-26 14:57     ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2015-08-26 16:03       ` Singh, Brijeshkumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55DDD3E2.4090606@acm.org \
    --to=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=Brijeshkumar.Singh@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox