Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: smd: Use correct remote processor ID

[Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>]

On 08/26/2015 10:42 PM, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch fixes SMEM addressing issues when remote processors need to use
> secure SMEM partitions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt      |    6 ++++++
>  drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c                             |   15 +++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> index f65c76d..97d9b3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,smd.txt
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The edge is described by the following properties:
>  	Definition: the identifier of the remote processor in the smd channel
>  		    allocation table
>  
> +- qcom,remote-pid:
> +	Usage: optional
> +	Value type: <u32>
> +	Definition: the identifier for the remote processor as known by the rest
> +		    of the system.
> +
>  = SMD DEVICES
>  
>  In turn, subnodes of the "edges" represent devices tied to SMD channels on that
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> index 327adcf..5706a81 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_edge {
>  	struct qcom_smd *smd;
>  	struct device_node *of_node;
>  	unsigned edge_id;
> +	unsigned remote_pid;

Andy, you forgot to add this new field in structure description header.

<snip>

-- 
regards,
Stan