From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: mhocko@kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@odin.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:40:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E00266.8030809@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440699420-30499-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
On 08/27/2015 08:16 PM, mhocko@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> b9d5c6b7ef57 ("[SCSI] cleanup setting task state in
> scsi_error_handler()") has introduced a race between scsi_error_handler
> and scsi_host_dev_release resulting in the hang when the device goes
> away because scsi_error_handler might miss a wake up:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> scsi_error_handler scsi_host_dev_release
> kthread_stop()
> kthread_should_stop()
> test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
> set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
> wake_up_process()
> wait_for_completion()
>
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
> schedule()
>
> The most straightforward solution seems to be to invert the ordering of
> the set_current_state and kthread_should_stop.
>
> The issue has been noticed during reboot test on a 3.0 based kernel but
> the current code seems to be affected in the same way.
>
> Cc: stable # 3.6+
> Reported-and-Debugged-by: Mike Mayer <Mike.Meyer@teradata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 6457a8a0db9c..2c0a817d5dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -2169,8 +2169,11 @@ int scsi_error_handler(void *data)
> * We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
> * disables signal delivery for the created thread.
> */
> - while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> + while (true) {
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + if (kthread_should_stop())
> + break;
> +
> if ((shost->host_failed == 0 && shost->host_eh_scheduled == 0) ||
> shost->host_failed != atomic_read(&shost->host_busy)) {
> SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(1,
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-28 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 18:16 [PATCH] scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race mhocko
2015-08-27 18:28 ` Dan Williams
2015-08-28 6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2015-08-28 14:56 ` James Bottomley
2015-08-28 15:17 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E00266.8030809@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox