From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 11:38:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5803F.3090704@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUm-eRpPmoNARdPVsi9=4Fqxp8crfgOXZkVTdAFhNzngQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/09/15 11:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On the unlikely event that drv is null, the current code will
>> perform a null pointer dereference with it when printing a dev_dbg
>> message. Instead, the BUG_ON check on drv should be performed
>> before we emit the dev_dbg message.
>
> What about just removing the BUG_ON()?
>
> The system will crash anyway, providing a backtrace.
I personally think a BUG_ON() shows intention to try to catch an
unexpected issue in a standard way as opposed to just removing it and
then hitting an issue with a null ptr deference.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/ps3/ps3-vuart.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ps3/ps3-vuart.c b/drivers/ps3/ps3-vuart.c
>> index d6db822..632701a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ps3/ps3-vuart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ps3/ps3-vuart.c
>> @@ -1000,12 +1000,11 @@ static int ps3_vuart_probe(struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev)
>> dev_dbg(&dev->core, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
>>
>> drv = ps3_system_bus_dev_to_vuart_drv(dev);
>> + BUG_ON(!drv);
>>
>> dev_dbg(&dev->core, "%s:%d: (%s)\n", __func__, __LINE__,
>> drv->core.core.name);
>>
>> - BUG_ON(!drv);
>> -
>> if (dev->port_number >= PORT_COUNT) {
>> BUG();
>> return -EINVAL;
>
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 10:21 [PATCH] ps3-vuart: BUG_ON on null drv before dereferencing it on dev_dbg Colin King
2015-09-01 10:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-09-01 10:38 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
2015-09-01 11:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-09-01 17:20 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E5803F.3090704@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox