From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753450AbbICJXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2015 05:23:10 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:60105 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752634AbbICJXH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2015 05:23:07 -0400 Message-ID: <55E81117.2040900@ti.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:51:27 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulf Hansson , Olof Johansson , Tony Lindgren , Mark Brown CC: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mmc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIE1vbGw=?= , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Benoit Cousson , Russell King - ARM Linux , Liam Girdwood , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] regulator: Fix pbias regulator enable References: <1441263042-12942-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday 03 September 2015 01:09 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Olof > > On 3 September 2015 at 08:50, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually >> have the offset from syscon. >> >> However after >> "ARM: dts: : add minimal l4 bus layout with control module >> support" >> vsel_reg and enable_reg started to have the absolute address because >> of address translation that happens due to pbias node made as the >> child node of syscon. This breaks the pbias regulator enable. >> >> This series adds the 'offset' to be populated in vsel_reg and enable_reg >> in the pbias driver itself. >> >> Changes from v1: >> *) Fixed Tony's review comments on adding a 'comment' for adding offset in >> the driver and adding a warning for using platform_get_resource. >> *) Added Tony's Acked-by. >> >> Tested these patches against mmc -next in omap4 panda, omap3 beagle xm, >> dra72 and omap5 uevm >> >> Kishon Vijay Abraham I (6): >> regulator: pbias: program pbias register offset in pbias driver >> ARM: dts: dra7: use "ti,pbias-dra7" compatible string for pbias >> ARM: dts: omap243x: use "ti,pbias-omap2" compatible string for pbias >> ARM: dts: omap3: use "ti,pbias-omap3" compatible string for pbias >> ARM: dts: omap4: use "ti,pbias-omap4" compatible string for pbias >> ARM: dts: omap5: use "ti,pbias-omap5" compatible string for pbias >> >> .../bindings/regulator/pbias-regulator.txt | 7 ++- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2430.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 2 +- >> drivers/regulator/pbias-regulator.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++--- >> 7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> > > I have recently queued another patchset [1] for the mmc omap driver > for 4.3 through my mmc tree for which Olof Johansson reported a > regression [2] for Panda ES with multi_v7_defconfig. I generally perform my tests with omap2plus_defconfig and without this series MMC doesn't work with omap2plus_defconfig. > > Kishon, could you please clarify if $subject patchset solves that > regression reported by Olof? Or perhaps Olof can run a test? Just checked multi_v7_defconfig and this series is definitely required to get MMC working. But we also have to enable 'CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS' which is not enabled by default in multi_v7_defconfig. So we should have a patch to enable 'CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS' in multi_v7_defconfig to completely solve the problem reported by Olof. I'll prepare a patch for multi_v7_defconfig and post it asap. Thanks Kishon > > Finally, perhaps it's better if we queue this through my mmc tree > since we would then be able to avoid the regression - if I put > $subject patchset before [1], right? Then I need an ack from Mark for > the regulator patch. > Please tell me if you guys prefer another way. > > Kind regards > Uffe > > [1] > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2027789 > > [2] > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg33146.html >