From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756677AbbIDMER (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:04:17 -0400
Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:1320 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752862AbbIDMEO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:04:14 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,469,1437436800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="297664327"
Message-ID: <55E98885.6050207@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:03:17 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel crash with "xen: avoid early crash of memory
 limited dom0"
References: <55E968DA.8040207@citrix.com> <55E96E2C.2090800@citrix.com>
 <55E9868C.7090800@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <55E9868C.7090800@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-DLP: MIA2
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 04/09/15 12:54, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 12:10 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 04/09/15 10:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The following commit:
>>>
>>> commit fa84f27e21200dbe7d18c21af424d1de703b7567
>>> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>> Date:   Wed Aug 19 18:52:34 2015 +0200
>>>
>>> xen: avoid early crash of memory limited dom0
>>>
>>> Which is queued in:
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git for-linus-4.3
>>
>> I was going to send the pull request for this branch today but I guess
>> it'll have to wait until next week.
>>
>> Juergen, if a fix for this isn't available by Wednesday next week I'll
>> shall have to drop all the >512 GB support patches from this branch.
> 
> I've been able to reproduce the issue and found the problem
> already. David, do you want an incremental patch or V2 of the
> problematic patch Roger mentioned (it's just one line)?

Great! Can I get an incremental patch, please?

David