public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: <acme@kernel.org>, <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	<pi3orama@163.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix invalid memory accessing
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 21:08:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55ED8C49.4050907@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150907130314.GB23219@krava.brq.redhat.com>



On 2015/9/7 21:03, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 12:51:55PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>> Commit e1e499aba570a2ea84d29822b7ea637ac41d9a51 (perf tools: Add
>> processor socket info to hist_entry and addr_location) reads env->cpu
>> array for each sample using index al.cpu. However, al.cpu can be -1 if
>> sample doesn't select PERF_SAMPLE_CPU. Also, env->cpu can be invalid if
>> feature CPU_TOPOLOGY not selected. We should validate env->cpu and al.cpu
>> before setting al.socket.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Although theoretically CPU_TOPOLOGY feature should always be selected by
>> 'perf record', I did generate a perf.data without that feature. It has
>> header like this:
>>
>>   # perf report -i ./bad.perf.data  --header-only
>>   # ========
>>   # captured on: Thu Jan  8 09:30:15 2009
>>   # hostname : localhost
>>   # os release : 3.10.49-gd672fc4
>>   # perf version : 4.2.gc9df
>>   # arch : aarch64
>>   # nrcpus online : 8
>>   # nrcpus avail : 8
>>   # total memory : 1850768 kB
>>   # cmdline : /system/bin/perf record -e sync:sync_timeline -e kgsl:kgsl_register_event -g -a sleep 5
>>   # event : name = sync:sync_timeline, , id = { 1107, 1108, 1109, 1110, 1111, 1112 }, type = 2, size = 112, config = 0x3e7, { sample_period, sample_freq } = 1, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|CALLCHAIN|ID|CPU|PERIOD|RAW, read_format = ID, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, mmap = 1, comm = 1, task = 1, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1, mmap2 = 1, comm_exec = 1
>>   # event : name = kgsl:kgsl_register_event, , id = { 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1118 }, type = 2, size = 112, config = 0x350, { sample_period, sample_freq } = 1, sample_type = IP|TID|TIME|CALLCHAIN|ID|CPU|PERIOD|RAW, read_format = ID, disabled = 1, inherit = 1, sample_id_all = 1, exclude_guest = 1
>>   # pmu mappings: cpu = 4, software = 1, tracepoint = 2
>>   # ========
>>   #
>>
>> It should be:
>>
>>   # ========
>>   # captured on: Thu Jan  8 11:26:41 2009
>>   ...
>>   # HEADER_CPU_TOPOLOGY info available, use -I to display
>>   # pmu mappings: cpu = 4, software = 1, tracepoint = 2
>>   # ========
>>
>> However, bad perf.data appears randomly. I can't stably reproduce it, so I
>> guess there might have another invalid memory accessing.
>>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> index 4b43245..16d097d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
>> @@ -158,8 +158,16 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
>>   		return -1;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	/* read socket id from perf.data for perf report */
>> -	al.socket = env->cpu[al.cpu].socket_id;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * read socket id from perf.data for perf report
>> +	 * al.cpu is invalid if PERF_SAMPLE_CPU is not selected by this
>> +	 * sample.
>> +	 * env->cpu is invalid if CPU_TOPOLOGY feature is not set in
>> +	 * header.
>> +	 */
>> +	al.socket = -1;
>> +	if (env->cpu && al.cpu >= 0)
>> +		al.socket = env->cpu[al.cpu].socket_id;
> perf_event__preprocess_sample initializes al.socket from current system

No. For 'perf report' it initializes al.cpu from sample.


Commit message of e1e499aba570a2ea84d29822b7ea637ac41d9a51:

     Finor 'perf report', the socket id info is from perf.data.

     For others, the socket id info is from current system.

And at least checking of env->cpu is essential. I'm looking the problem 
I reported.
Looks like build_cpu_topology() is possible to fail.

Thank you.
> do we want to move this over there?
>
> also this change is just report specific, and we could need
> this in at least perf top
>
> jirka



  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-07 12:51 [PATCH] perf report: Fix invalid memory accessing Wang Nan
2015-09-07 13:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-07 13:08   ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-09-07 13:27 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-08  7:37   ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-08  8:12     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-08 13:13       ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-08 13:16         ` pi3orama
2015-09-08 13:33           ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-08 13:42       ` Liang, Kan
2015-09-08 15:18     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-08 15:34       ` Jiri Olsa
     [not found]         ` <20150908154910.GN3475@kernel.org>
2015-09-08 15:58           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-08 16:13             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-08 16:35               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 16:06                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 16:46                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55ED8C49.4050907@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox