From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754999AbbIHNUF (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:20:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:34582 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754956AbbIHNT4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:56 -0400 Message-ID: <55EEE071.7040506@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 21:19:45 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Zyngier , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Tomasz Nowicki , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas CC: linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure References: <1441386412-8139-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1441386412-8139-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, Sorry for the late response for quite a while... On 09/05/2015 01:06 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel > requires before being able to use the device driver model. > > ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one > we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and > clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up > and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly > hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer. > > It turns out that providing such a probing infrastructure is rather > easy, and provides a much deserved cleanup in both the arch code, the > GIC driver, and the architected timer driver. > > I'm sure there is some more code to be deleted, and one can only > wonder why this wasn't done before the arm64 code was initially merged > (the diffstat says it all...). > > Patches are against v4.2, and a branch is available at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git acpi/device-probing Great thanks to cleanup these stuff, I will test this patch set and review it, will get back to you if I get anything. Thanks Hanjun