* [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not regard CMA pages as free on watermark check
@ 2015-09-09 14:44 Vitaly Wool
2015-09-09 17:56 ` Laura Abbott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Wool @ 2015-09-09 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
__zone_watermark_ok() does not corrrectly take high-order
CMA pageblocks into account: high-order CMA blocks are not
removed from the watermark check. Moreover, CMA pageblocks
may suddenly vanish through CMA allocation, so let's not
regard these pages as free in __zone_watermark_ok().
This patch also adds some primitive testing for the method
implemented which has proven that it works as it should.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 +
mm/page_alloc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index ac00e20..73268f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static inline int get_pfnblock_migratetype(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn)
struct free_area {
struct list_head free_list[MIGRATE_TYPES];
unsigned long nr_free;
+ unsigned long nr_free_cma;
};
struct pglist_data;
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5b5240b..69fbc93 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -672,6 +672,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
} else {
list_del(&buddy->lru);
zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
+ if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
rmv_page_order(buddy);
}
combined_idx = buddy_idx & page_idx;
@@ -705,6 +707,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
list_add(&page->lru, &zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
out:
zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
+ if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma++;
}
static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
@@ -1278,6 +1282,8 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
}
list_add(&page[size].lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]);
area->nr_free++;
+ if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+ area->nr_free_cma++;
set_page_order(&page[size], high);
}
}
@@ -1379,6 +1385,8 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
list_del(&page->lru);
rmv_page_order(page);
area->nr_free--;
+ if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+ area->nr_free_cma--;
expand(zone, page, order, current_order, area, migratetype);
set_freepage_migratetype(page, migratetype);
return page;
@@ -1428,6 +1436,7 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
struct page *page;
unsigned long order;
int pages_moved = 0;
+ int mt;
#ifndef CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE
/*
@@ -1457,7 +1466,12 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
order = page_order(page);
list_move(&page->lru,
&zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
+ mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
+ if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
set_freepage_migratetype(page, migratetype);
+ if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma++;
page += 1 << order;
pages_moved += 1 << order;
}
@@ -1621,6 +1635,8 @@ __rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
/* Remove the page from the freelists */
area->nr_free--;
+ if (unlikely(is_migrate_cma(start_migratetype)))
+ area->nr_free_cma--;
list_del(&page->lru);
rmv_page_order(page);
@@ -2012,6 +2028,8 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
/* Remove page from free list */
list_del(&page->lru);
zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
+ if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
+ zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
rmv_page_order(page);
set_page_owner(page, order, __GFP_MOVABLE);
@@ -2220,7 +2238,6 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order,
/* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */
long min = mark;
int o;
- long free_cma = 0;
free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1;
if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGH)
@@ -2228,17 +2245,43 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order,
if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)
min -= min / 4;
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
- /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */
+ /*
+ * We don't want to regard the pages on CMA region as free
+ * on watermark checking, since they cannot be used for
+ * unmovable/reclaimable allocation and they can suddenly
+ * vanish through CMA allocation
+ */
if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA))
- free_cma = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES);
+ free_pages -= zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
+ {
+ long nr_free_cma;
+ for (o = 0, nr_free_cma = 0; o < MAX_ORDER; o++)
+ nr_free_cma += z->free_area[o].nr_free_cma << o;
+
+ /* nr_free_cma is a bit more realtime than zone_page_state
+ * and may thus differ from it a little, and it's ok
+ */
+ if (abs(nr_free_cma -
+ zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES)) > 256)
+ pr_info_ratelimited("%s: nr_free_cma %ld instead of %ld\n",
+ __func__,
+ nr_free_cma,
+ zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES));
+ }
--
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not regard CMA pages as free on watermark check
2015-09-09 14:44 [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not regard CMA pages as free on watermark check Vitaly Wool
@ 2015-09-09 17:56 ` Laura Abbott
[not found] ` <CAMJBoFNsCuktUC0aZF6Xw05v4g_2eK1G183KkSkhQYkztEVHCA@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Laura Abbott @ 2015-09-09 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitaly Wool, linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
(cc-ing linux-mm)
On 09/09/2015 07:44 AM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> __zone_watermark_ok() does not corrrectly take high-order
> CMA pageblocks into account: high-order CMA blocks are not
> removed from the watermark check. Moreover, CMA pageblocks
> may suddenly vanish through CMA allocation, so let's not
> regard these pages as free in __zone_watermark_ok().
>
> This patch also adds some primitive testing for the method
> implemented which has proven that it works as it should.
>
The choice to include CMA as part of watermarks was pretty deliberate.
Do you have a description of the problem you are facing with
the watermark code as is? Any performance numbers?
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 +
> mm/page_alloc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index ac00e20..73268f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ static inline int get_pfnblock_migratetype(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn)
> struct free_area {
> struct list_head free_list[MIGRATE_TYPES];
> unsigned long nr_free;
> + unsigned long nr_free_cma;
> };
>
> struct pglist_data;
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5b5240b..69fbc93 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> } else {
> list_del(&buddy->lru);
> zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
> + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
> rmv_page_order(buddy);
> }
> combined_idx = buddy_idx & page_idx;
> @@ -705,6 +707,8 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> list_add(&page->lru, &zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
> out:
> zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
> + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma++;
> }
>
> static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> @@ -1278,6 +1282,8 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> }
> list_add(&page[size].lru, &area->free_list[migratetype]);
> area->nr_free++;
> + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
> + area->nr_free_cma++;
> set_page_order(&page[size], high);
> }
> }
> @@ -1379,6 +1385,8 @@ struct page *__rmqueue_smallest(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
> list_del(&page->lru);
> rmv_page_order(page);
> area->nr_free--;
> + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
> + area->nr_free_cma--;
> expand(zone, page, order, current_order, area, migratetype);
> set_freepage_migratetype(page, migratetype);
> return page;
> @@ -1428,6 +1436,7 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long order;
> int pages_moved = 0;
> + int mt;
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE
> /*
> @@ -1457,7 +1466,12 @@ int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> order = page_order(page);
> list_move(&page->lru,
> &zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
> + mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> + if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
> set_freepage_migratetype(page, migratetype);
> + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma++;
> page += 1 << order;
> pages_moved += 1 << order;
> }
> @@ -1621,6 +1635,8 @@ __rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
>
> /* Remove the page from the freelists */
> area->nr_free--;
> + if (unlikely(is_migrate_cma(start_migratetype)))
> + area->nr_free_cma--;
> list_del(&page->lru);
> rmv_page_order(page);
>
> @@ -2012,6 +2028,8 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> /* Remove page from free list */
> list_del(&page->lru);
> zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
> + if (is_migrate_cma(mt))
> + zone->free_area[order].nr_free_cma--;
> rmv_page_order(page);
>
> set_page_owner(page, order, __GFP_MOVABLE);
> @@ -2220,7 +2238,6 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order,
> /* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */
> long min = mark;
> int o;
> - long free_cma = 0;
>
> free_pages -= (1 << order) - 1;
> if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGH)
> @@ -2228,17 +2245,43 @@ static bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z, unsigned int order,
> if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HARDER)
> min -= min / 4;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> - /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */
> + /*
> + * We don't want to regard the pages on CMA region as free
> + * on watermark checking, since they cannot be used for
> + * unmovable/reclaimable allocation and they can suddenly
> + * vanish through CMA allocation
> + */
> if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA))
> - free_cma = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES);
> + free_pages -= zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> + {
> + long nr_free_cma;
> + for (o = 0, nr_free_cma = 0; o < MAX_ORDER; o++)
> + nr_free_cma += z->free_area[o].nr_free_cma << o;
> +
> + /* nr_free_cma is a bit more realtime than zone_page_state
> + * and may thus differ from it a little, and it's ok
> + */
> + if (abs(nr_free_cma -
> + zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES)) > 256)
> + pr_info_ratelimited("%s: nr_free_cma %ld instead of %ld\n",
> + __func__,
> + nr_free_cma,
> + zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES));
> + }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not regard CMA pages as free on watermark check
[not found] ` <CAMJBoFNsCuktUC0aZF6Xw05v4g_2eK1G183KkSkhQYkztEVHCA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-09-10 6:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vlastimil Babka @ 2015-09-10 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vitaly Wool, Laura Abbott
Cc: Vitaly Wool, LKML, linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim, Mel Gorman
[CC Joonsoo, Mel]
On 09/09/2015 08:31 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> (cc-ing linux-mm)
>> On 09/09/2015 07:44 AM, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>>
>>> __zone_watermark_ok() does not corrrectly take high-order
>>> CMA pageblocks into account: high-order CMA blocks are not
>>> removed from the watermark check. Moreover, CMA pageblocks
>>> may suddenly vanish through CMA allocation, so let's not
>>> regard these pages as free in __zone_watermark_ok().
>>>
>>> This patch also adds some primitive testing for the method
>>> implemented which has proven that it works as it should.
>>>
>>>
>> The choice to include CMA as part of watermarks was pretty deliberate.
>> Do you have a description of the problem you are facing with
>> the watermark code as is? Any performance numbers?
>>
>>
> let's start with facing the fact that the calculation in
> __zone_watermark_ok() is done incorrectly for the case when ALLOC_CMA is
> not set. While going through pages by order it is implicitly considered
You're not the first who tried to fix it, I think Joonsoo tried as well?
I think the main objection was against further polluting fastpaths due to CMA.
Note that Mel has a patchset removing high-order watermark checks (in the last
patch of https://lwn.net/Articles/655406/ ) so this will be moot afterwards.
> that CMA pages can be used and this impacts the result of the function.
>
> This can be solved in a slightly different way compared to what I proposed
> but it needs per-order CMA pages accounting anyway. Then it would have
> looked like:
>
> for (o = 0; o < order; o++) {
> /* At the next order, this order's pages become unavailable
> */
> free_pages -= z->free_area[o].nr_free << o;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA))
> free_pages -= z->free_area[o].nr_free_cma << o;
> /* Require fewer higher order pages to be free */
> min >>= 1;
> ...
>
> But what we have also seen is that CMA pages may suddenly disappear due to
> CMA allocator work so the whole watermark checking was still unreliable,
> causing compaction to not run when it ought to and thus leading to
Well, watermark checking is inherently racy. CMA pages disappearing is no
exception, non-CMA pages may disappear as well.
> (otherwise redundant) low memory killer operations, so I decided to propose
> a safer method instead.
>
> Best regards,
> Vitaly
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-10 6:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-09 14:44 [PATCH/RFC] mm: do not regard CMA pages as free on watermark check Vitaly Wool
2015-09-09 17:56 ` Laura Abbott
[not found] ` <CAMJBoFNsCuktUC0aZF6Xw05v4g_2eK1G183KkSkhQYkztEVHCA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-09-10 6:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox