Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs

[Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>]

On 10.09.2015 16:07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
> from interrupt is fine.
> 
> While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>

> ---
>  kernel/cpu.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 94bbe46..24551f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *g, *p;
>  
> -	read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> -	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
>  		if (!p->on_rq)
>  			continue;
>  		/*
> @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
>  
>  		pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
>  			p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
> -	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> -	read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> +	}
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  }
>  
>  struct take_cpu_down_param {
>