* [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs
@ 2015-09-10 13:07 Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-10 13:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2015-09-10 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Kirill Tkhai, Srikar Dronamraju, linux-kernel
check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
from interrupt is fine.
While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 94bbe46..24551f2 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
- read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
if (!p->on_rq)
continue;
/*
@@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
- } while_each_thread(g, p);
- read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
struct take_cpu_down_param {
--
1.5.5.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs
2015-09-10 13:07 [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Oleg Nesterov
@ 2015-09-10 13:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-09-11 10:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-09-13 10:56 ` [tip:sched/core] cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn' t " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Tkhai @ 2015-09-10 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Kirill Tkhai, Srikar Dronamraju,
linux-kernel
On 10.09.2015 16:07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
> from interrupt is fine.
>
> While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 94bbe46..24551f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
> {
> struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
> - read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> - do_each_thread(g, p) {
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> if (!p->on_rq)
> continue;
> /*
> @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
>
> pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
> p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
> - } while_each_thread(g, p);
> - read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> + }
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> }
>
> struct take_cpu_down_param {
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs
2015-09-10 13:07 [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-10 13:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
@ 2015-09-11 10:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-09-13 10:56 ` [tip:sched/core] cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn' t " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Srikar Dronamraju @ 2015-09-11 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Kirill Tkhai, linux-kernel
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2015-09-10 15:07:50]:
> check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive read_lock()
> from interrupt is fine.
>
> While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn' t need to disable irqs
2015-09-10 13:07 [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-10 13:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-09-11 10:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
@ 2015-09-13 10:56 ` tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov @ 2015-09-13 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: peterz, ktkhai, srikar, ktkhai, tglx, mingo, oleg, hpa,
linux-kernel, torvalds
Commit-ID: a75a6068dac25d4022ebcd82192ed6345407843c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a75a6068dac25d4022ebcd82192ed6345407843c
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:07:50 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:54:27 +0200
cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs
check_for_tasks() doesn't need to disable irqs, recursive
read_lock() from interrupt is fine.
While at it, s/do_each_thread/for_each_process_thread/.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150910130750.GA20055@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 82cf9df..050c634 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
- read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
if (!p->on_rq)
continue;
/*
@@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ static inline void check_for_tasks(int dead_cpu)
pr_warn("Task %s (pid=%d) is on cpu %d (state=%ld, flags=%x)\n",
p->comm, task_pid_nr(p), dead_cpu, p->state, p->flags);
- } while_each_thread(g, p);
- read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ }
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
struct take_cpu_down_param {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-13 10:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-10 13:07 [PATCH] check_for_tasks: read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn't need to disable irqs Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-10 13:31 ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-09-11 10:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-09-13 10:56 ` [tip:sched/core] cpu/hotplug: Read_lock(tasklist_lock) doesn' t " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox