From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/13] perf_env/CPU socket reorg/fixes
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:20:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F2C726.4080204@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441828225-667-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
I have tested patch 1 to 10. They looks good to me except patch 4/13. Please
see my email in that thread.
However, during the testing I found a limitation related to cpu
online/offline and 'perf top' that, if I offline most of cores before
'perf top', then online them during 'perf top' running, 'perf top'
dooesn't report new CPUs. It still reports the CPUs which are online
when 'perf top' starts consume 100% cycles. So if CPUs are online and
offlined dynamically and there are many CPUs, user of 'perf top' may get
confusion result if he or she doesn't noticed that 'perf top' doesn't
listed all cores they have.
Here is how I did this:
# for i in `seq 2 7` ; do echo 0 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online ; done
# perf top -s cpu,socket
The result is something like:
Samples: 28K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 23640606383
Overhead Socket CPU
67.14% 000 000
32.86% 000 001
Then online them:
# for i in `seq 2 7` ; do echo 1 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online ; done
After a while, 'perf top' still reports two CPUs.
Samples: 400K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 38728257939
Overhead Socket CPU
51.02% 000 001
48.98% 000 000
And another 'perf top' report correct result:
Samples: 28K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 24741565854
Overhead Socket CPU
27.26% 000 005
21.07% 000 002
13.07% 000 001
12.69% 000 000
8.07% 000 006
6.75% 000 007
5.64% 000 004
5.45% 000 003
However, It is relatively a rare case. I don't think we have to fix it
in this
patchset.
Thank you.
On 2015/9/10 3:50, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please take a look at these changes to fix the problems reported by
> Wang Nan wrt accesses to the cpu_topology_map information.
>
> The fixes are present on these following two csets:
>
> perf event: Use machine->env to find the cpu -> socket mapping
> perf report: Do not blindly use env->cpu[al.cpu].socket_id
>
> The rest are fixes made while working on this, infrastructure to enable
> the fixes, reverts for things that ended up not being necessary and some
> cleanups.
>
> It is available at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/env
>
> Please let me know if I can have your Acked-by, Tested-by or
> Reviewed-by.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (13):
> perf env: Move perf_env out of header.h and session.c into separate object
> perf env: Rename some leftovers from rename to perf_env
> perf env: Adopt perf_header__set_cmdline
> perf env: Introduce read_cpu_topology_map() method
> perf sort: Set flag stating if the "socket" key is being used
> perf top: Cache the cpu topology info when "-s socket" is used
> perf hists browser: Fixup the "cpu" column width calculation
> perf machine: Add pointer to sample's environment
> perf event: Use machine->env to find the cpu -> socket mapping
> perf report: Do not blindly use env->cpu[al.cpu].socket_id
> Revert "perf evsel: Add a backpointer to the evlist a evsel is in"
> perf evsel: Remove forward declaration of 'struct perf_evlist'
> Revert "perf evlist: Add backpointer for perf_env to evlist"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-09 19:50 [RFC 00/13] perf_env/CPU socket reorg/fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] perf env: Move perf_env out of header.h and session.c into separate object Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] perf env: Rename some leftovers from rename to perf_env Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] perf env: Adopt perf_header__set_cmdline Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] perf env: Introduce read_cpu_topology_map() method Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 21:41 ` Liang, Kan
2015-09-10 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-10 20:00 ` Liang, Kan
2015-09-10 20:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-10 20:14 ` Liang, Kan
2015-09-11 10:20 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-11 14:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 15:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 16:14 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-09-11 16:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-14 9:09 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf header: Fixup reading of HEADER_NRCPUS feature tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-15 7:04 ` [tip:perf/core] perf env: Introduce read_cpu_topology_map() method tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] perf sort: Set flag stating if the "socket" key is being used Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] perf top: Cache the cpu topology info when "-s socket" is used Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] perf hists browser: Fixup the "cpu" column width calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 10:52 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] perf machine: Add pointer to sample's environment Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] perf event: Use machine->env to find the cpu -> socket mapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] perf report: Do not blindly use env->cpu[al.cpu].socket_id Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 11:50 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] Revert "perf evsel: Add a backpointer to the evlist a evsel is in" Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 21:42 ` Liang, Kan
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] perf evsel: Remove forward declaration of 'struct perf_evlist' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-09 19:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] Revert "perf evlist: Add backpointer for perf_env to evlist" Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-10 9:19 ` [RFC 00/13] perf_env/CPU socket reorg/fixes Jiri Olsa
2015-09-10 14:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 12:20 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-09-11 13:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 13:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 13:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-11 13:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-14 1:37 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-09-14 1:26 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F2C726.4080204@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox