public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:53:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F75001.5080202@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F07E82.5000704@osg.samsung.com>

On 09/09/2015 12:46 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 11:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2015 10:45 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 09/09/2015 10:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>> Re-ping. Can someone pull this into their tree?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Kees
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>> This adds support for s390 to the seccomp selftests. Some improvements
>>>>>> were made to enhance the accuracy of failure reporting, and additional
>>>>>> tests were added to validate assumptions about the currently traced
>>>>>> syscall. Also adds early asserts for running on older kernels to avoid
>>>>>> noise when the seccomp syscall is not implemented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry looks like it got lost in my LinuxCon backlog. I will queue it
>>>> up for 4.3-rc1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. It doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next. Based on your comment
>>>
>>> "This applies on top of -next, following the addition of the powerpc
>>> tests."
>>
>> Well, it was -next when I sent it. :) The powerpc changes are now in
>> Linus's tree, so there should be no problem. Is your linux-kselftest
>> merged with 4.3-rc yet?
>>
> 
> Kees,
> 
> I will get this into 4.3-rc2 as this patch fixes failure paths with
> other fixes I am planning to send in rc2. Thanks for the ping on this.
> 

Applied to linux-kselftest fixes for 4.3-rc2

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-21 18:22 [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: add support for s390 Kees Cook
2015-09-09 16:40 ` Kees Cook
2015-09-09 16:45   ` Shuah Khan
2015-09-09 16:56     ` Shuah Khan
2015-09-09 17:23       ` Kees Cook
2015-09-09 18:46         ` Shuah Khan
2015-09-14 22:53           ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2015-09-10  9:11         ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F75001.5080202@osg.samsung.com \
    --to=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heicars2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=willeke@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox