linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:47:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F794CB.5040707@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150914214105.GH19736@linux-q0g1.site>

On 09/14/2015 05:41 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> You can't use debugfs if we want to have per-cpu stats. We will have 
>> to use sysfs instead. This will require more code changes. It is 
>> certainly doable, but we have to choose between simplicity and 
>> performance overhead. Right now, I am assuming that lock PV lockstat 
>> is used primarily for debugging purpose and won't be enabled on 
>> production system. If we want to have this capability in production 
>> systems, we will certainly need to change it to per-cpu stats and use 
>> sysfs instead.
>>
>> The original PV ticketlock code used debugfs and I was just following 
>> its footstep. Do you think it is worthwhile to have this capability 
>> available on production system by default?
>
> If we can prove that the overhead is small enough, and do it correctly
> (ie see how we do vmstats), it would be _very_ useful data to have
> enabled by default for debugging performance issues; methinks. But right
> now we have nowhere near that kind of data, not even with this atomic
> variant -- although I recall you did mention a workload in a previous
> iteration (which would be good to have in the changelog).

Using the per-cpu stats, the overhead should be pretty small as atomic 
instructions are not needed. I would probably need to encapsulate the 
stat code into another header file (e.g. qspinlock_pvstat.h) to avoid 
making the qspinlock_paravirt.h too complex. This will probably be a 
separate patch once this patch series can be merged.

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-15  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-11 18:37 [PATCH v6 0/6] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock performance Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code Waiman Long
2015-09-11 22:27   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-14 12:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 18:40       ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 15:16     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Unconditional PV kick with _Q_SLOW_VAL Waiman Long
2015-09-18  8:50   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Kick the PV CPU unconditionally when _Q_SLOW_VAL tip-bot for Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long
2015-09-11 23:13   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-14 15:25     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 21:41       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-09-15  3:47         ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long
2015-09-14 13:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:02     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:15     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 19:38       ` Waiman Long
2015-09-15  8:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-15 15:29         ` Waiman Long
2015-09-16 15:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-17 15:08             ` Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:19     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-11 18:37 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long
2015-09-14 14:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-14 19:37     ` Waiman Long
2015-09-15  8:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-15 15:32         ` Waiman Long
2015-09-16 15:03           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F794CB.5040707@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).