From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752059AbbIOMJE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:09:04 -0400
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:33101 "EHLO
	mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751480AbbIOMJB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:09:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] genirq: irqdomain: Remove irqdomain dependency on
 struct device_node
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
References: <1442249047-21182-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <1442249047-21182-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <55F7F9E2.3070105@linaro.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509151401340.3971@nanos>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
        Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk>, Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <55F80A56.70107@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:08:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/38.0 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509151401340.3971@nanos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 15.09.2015 14:04, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>
> Can you folks please do proper quoting on reply? It's annoying to
> scroll down 250+ lines to find TWO lines of reply and then have
> another 250+ lines for nothing.
>

Yeah, good point! Sorry.

Tomasz