Re: [PATCH 04/26] usb: gadget: introduce 'enabled' flag in struct usb_ep

Felipe Balbi
2015-09-15T16:01:40Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3547 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:57:53PM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 05:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On 09/15/2015 04:26 PM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> >>> This patch introduces 'enabled' flag in struct usb_ep, and modifies
> >>> usb_ep_enable() and usb_ep_disable() functions to encapsulate endpoint
> >>> enabled/disabled state. It helps to avoid enabling endpoints which are
> >>> already enabled, and disabling endpoints which are already disables.
> >>>
> >>> >From now USB functions don't have to remember current endpoint
> >>> enable/disable state, as this state is now handled automatically which
> >>> makes this API less bug-prone.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> include/linux/usb/gadget.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
> >>> index 3f299e2..63375cd 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/usb/gadget.h
> >>> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ struct usb_ep {
> >>> struct list_head ep_list;
> >>> struct usb_ep_caps caps;
> >>> bool claimed;
> >>> + bool enabled;
> >>> unsigned maxpacket:16;
> >>> unsigned maxpacket_limit:16;
> >>> unsigned max_streams:16;
> >>> @@ -264,7 +265,15 @@ static inline void usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(struct usb_ep *ep,
> >>> */
> >>> static inline int usb_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *ep)
> >>> {
> >>> - return ep->ops->enable(ep, ep->desc);
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!ep->enabled) {
> >>> + ret = ep->ops->enable(ep, ep->desc);
> >>> + if (!ret)
> >>> + ep->enabled = true;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> @@ -281,7 +290,15 @@ static inline int usb_ep_enable(struct usb_ep *ep)
> >>> */
> >>> static inline int usb_ep_disable(struct usb_ep *ep)
> >>> {
> >>> - return ep->ops->disable(ep);
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (ep->enabled) {
> >>> + ret = ep->ops->disable(ep);
> >>> + if (!ret)
> >>> + ep->enabled = false;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>
> >> Personally I don't like this convention. In my opinion usb_ep_disable() &
> >> usb_ep_enable() should fail if ep is already disabled/enabled. Then in
> >> function code we should check if endpoint is enabled (maybe even we should
> >> have usb_ep_is_enabled()) and call disable only when it is really enabled.
> >
> > usb_ep_is_enabled() should be a good addition but I don't see an issue
> > ignoring usb_ep_enabled() for something that's already enabled.
> >
> > Imagine if you got an error when you tried to push the light switch to
> > the 'on' position while the light was already on :-p
> >
> > I do think, though, that this can be simplified by returning early if
> > already enabled:
> >
> > usb_ep_enable()
> > {
> > if (ep->enabled)
> > return 0;
> >
> > return ep->ops->enable(ep, ep->desc);
> > }
> >
> > and likewise for usb_ep_disable()
>
> We can't do that, because we need to toggle ep->enable flag.

man, things have to be spelled out to the last comma... The point was to
avoid the extra identation level

usb_ep_enable()
{
int ret;

if (ep->enabled)
return 0;

ret = ep->ops->enable(ep, ep->desc);
if (ret)
return ret;

ep->enabled = true;

return 0;
}

--
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]