From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752330AbbIPLQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:16:54 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:2613 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751934AbbIPLQx (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:16:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] ia64: rename migrate_irqs() to avoid compiling error To: Thomas Gleixner References: <1442375907-11496-1-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> <1442375907-11496-3-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> CC: , , Jiang Liu , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , Hanjun Guo From: Yang Yingliang Message-ID: <55F94EE4.50104@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:13:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.19.219] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2015/9/16 16:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015, Yang Yingliang wrote: > >> To avoid multi-declaration error after adding migrate_irqs into >> kernel/irq/migration.c, rename migrate_irqs() to move_irqs(). > > And why can't you chose a different name for the generic function > instead of creating useless churn in IA64? I am not sure which way is better at first. Never mind, I will chose a new name for the generic function. Thanks, Yang > > Thanks, > > tglx > > . >