From: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ortwin Glück" <odi@odi.ch>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Failover root devices
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:49:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FAFD1D.8030305@cmpwn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvyMNtrtk5KBQhWbPLiqG6LqqfnAJHG0rfhFfWfJFDfeng@mail.gmail.com>
> I really don't see why we need this feature in-kernel as it can be
> done perfectly fine
> in userspace. Every non-trivial system needs an initramfs anyway these days.
Most initramfs systems will parse the root= line of your kernel command
line and use it to remount root. The kernel seems like the best place to
establish this, since the various initramfs solutions will implement the
same format just to support parsing the kernel command line correctly. I
mean, maybe that's not enough to justify putting it in the kernel, but
that's why I see the kernel as the appropriate place to implement this
feature.
--
Drew DeVault
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 11:40 Failover root devices Ortwin Glück
2015-09-17 11:49 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 17:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 17:49 ` Drew DeVault [this message]
2015-09-17 17:52 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:05 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:18 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:21 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:28 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 14:59 ` Ortwin Glück
2015-09-18 15:00 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 15:04 ` Ortwin Glück
2015-09-18 15:36 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 18:27 ` Harald Hoyer
2015-09-17 18:29 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:35 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:37 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 18:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-18 14:40 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-17 0:16 Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 16:02 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 17:30 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 14:34 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-18 14:43 ` Drew DeVault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FAFD1D.8030305@cmpwn.com \
--to=sir@cmpwn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=odi@odi.ch \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox