From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ortwin Glück" <odi@odi.ch>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Failover root devices
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:52:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FAFDE1.2020707@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FAFD1D.8030305@cmpwn.com>
Am 17.09.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Drew DeVault:
>> I really don't see why we need this feature in-kernel as it can be
>> done perfectly fine
>> in userspace. Every non-trivial system needs an initramfs anyway these days.
>
> Most initramfs systems will parse the root= line of your kernel command line and use it to remount root. The kernel seems like the best place to establish this, since the various
> initramfs solutions will implement the same format just to support parsing the kernel command line correctly. I mean, maybe that's not enough to justify putting it in the kernel,
> but that's why I see the kernel as the appropriate place to implement this feature.
Better send a patch to dracut folks. :-)
Major distros use it and if the feature is nice other initramfs implementations will adopt it too.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 11:40 Failover root devices Ortwin Glück
2015-09-17 11:49 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 17:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 17:49 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 17:52 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-09-17 18:05 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:18 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:21 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:28 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 14:59 ` Ortwin Glück
2015-09-18 15:00 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 15:04 ` Ortwin Glück
2015-09-18 15:36 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 18:27 ` Harald Hoyer
2015-09-17 18:29 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:35 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 18:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-17 18:37 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 18:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-18 14:40 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-17 0:16 Drew DeVault
2015-09-17 16:02 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-17 17:30 ` Drew DeVault
2015-09-18 14:34 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-09-18 14:43 ` Drew DeVault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FAFDE1.2020707@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=odi@odi.ch \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=sir@cmpwn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox