From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777AbbIRHc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:32:26 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:29231 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751275AbbIRHcY (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:32:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2 To: Stephen Boyd References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org> <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com> <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> CC: Gabriel Fernandez , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Srinivas Kandagatla , Patrice Chotard , Russell King , Michael Turquette , Peter Griffin , Pankaj Dev , Olivier Bideau , Geert Uytterhoeven , Fabian Frederick , , , , , From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: <55FBBDCE.8070905@st.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.201.21.241] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-09-18_03:2015-09-17,2015-09-18,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/17/2015 08:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >>>> This patch set fixes a kernel crash : >>> [..] >>>> This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit: >>>> commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x") >>> It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list >>> is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel >>> free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch >>> doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the >>> typo didn't go through our tree. >> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT). >> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc. >> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think. >> > Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not > worried, I'm not worried. I'm not worried about bisectability indeed, as the first patch is just typo fixes in DT Bindings documentation. Regards, Maxime