From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add spurious wakeup quirk for Lynxpoint controllers
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:56:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FC4221.907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FBE50A.6060001@intel.com>
On 09/18/2015 03:18 AM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 10.09.2015 20:27, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> We received several reports of systems rebooting and powering on
>> after an attempted shutdown. Testing showed that setting
>> XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP quirk in addition to the XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT
>> quirk allowed the system to shutdown as expected for Lynxpoint
>> xHCI controllers. Set the qurik.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
>> ---
>
> We used to have the XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP flag set for lynxpoint controllers,
> but it was removed in commit:
>
> commit b45abacde3d551c6696c6738bef4a1805d0bf27a
> xhci: no switching back on non-ULT Haswell
> The switch back is limited to ULT even on HP. The contrary
> finding arose by bad luck in BIOS versions for testing.
> This fixes spontaneous resume from S3 on some HP laptops.
>
> Adding the SPURIOUS_WAKEUP flag back looks reasonable to me,
> but I don't want to break suspend.
> I don't understand how it could have caused spontaneous resume in HP laptops
> in the first place, it really shouldn't do anything before shutdown.
>
> Better ask Oliver,
> Do you still have access to the HP laptop?
> Any chance you could see if the flag still causes spontaneous resume?
>
> -Mathias
Would you rather see a revert of the patch you gave rather than a new
one re-introducing the flag?
Thanks,
Laura
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 17:27 [RFC][PATCH] Add spurious wakeup quirk for Lynxpoint controllers Laura Abbott
2015-09-18 10:18 ` Mathias Nyman
2015-09-18 11:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2015-09-18 16:56 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2015-09-18 20:25 ` Oliver Neukum
2015-09-24 8:03 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FC4221.907@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox