From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753616AbbIWSGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:06:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:36566 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752082AbbIWSGO (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:06:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] 192132b9a0: -17.5% netperf.Throughput_tps To: Huang Ying References: <87eghtb7e8.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <55FF5B08.7010807@cumulusnetworks.com> <1442799211.8474.49.camel@intel.com> Cc: lkp@01.org, LKML , "David S. Miller" From: David Ahern Message-ID: <5602EA12.2010102@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:06:10 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1442799211.8474.49.camel@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/20/15 7:33 PM, Huang Ying wrote: >> Also, this is the end patch of a series that first refactors and then >> adds a capability. The more relevant comparison is 8f58336d3f78 to >> 192132b9a034 (8f58336d3f78 is the commit before the series). Is it >> possible to get this test run on your system comparing those 2 >> commits? > I take it you have CONFIG_NET_VRF enabled. correct? With it disabled I see no relevant change in performance between 8f58336d3f78 and 192132b9a034. Can you confirm? Thanks, David