From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932679AbbIXH64 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:58:56 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:4720 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756706AbbIXH6y (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:58:54 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,579,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="775923896" Message-ID: <5603AE3C.10302@intel.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:03:08 +0300 From: Mathias Nyman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Neukum , Laura Abbott CC: Laura Abbott , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add spurious wakeup quirk for Lynxpoint controllers References: <1441906034-5033-1-git-send-email-labbott@fedoraproject.org> <55FBE50A.6060001@intel.com> <55FC4221.907@redhat.com> <1442607936.7469.1.camel@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1442607936.7469.1.camel@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.09.2015 23:25, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:56 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: >> Would you rather see a revert of the patch you gave rather than a new >> one re-introducing the flag? > > We need a big fat comment here saying that different tests should > different results and the quirk is needed for LynxPoint. That > suggests a new patch. > I'll take the patch from Laura and add the big fat warning to it myself -Mathias