From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: add soft reset on kexec/kdump support
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:08:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560A8D63.5010302@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737xx4fp8.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On 09/29/2015 07:39 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> writes:
>
>> On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the
>>>>>>>> hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under
>>>>>>>> is_hardware_domain(). Are there other patches that will support HVM
>>>>>>>> guests?
>>>>>>> Please see my Xen series:
>>>>>>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-09/msg00547.html
>>>>>>> (last 'full' submission).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All patches from my 'toolstack-assisted approach to PVHVM guest kexec'
>>>>>>> are already merged to xen.git (first 10 are already in 'master' and the
>>>>>>> last one is in 'staging').
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, so I was looking at the right tree. Then I don't understand how
>>>>>> SHUTDOWN_soft_reset would be reached for a non-privileged domain. The only
>>>>>> path that I see is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> domain_shutdown()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
>>>>>> hwdom_shutdown(reason);
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there another path to handle this op?
>>>>> Yes:
>>>>> e1bd9812966de9a16f30a58e7162b80bd6af361b libxc: support XEN_DOMCTL_soft_reset operation
>>>>> and
>>>>> c57e6ebd8c3e490e353e68d96abec1dad01e72f5 (lib)xl: soft reset support
>>>>>
>>>> That's toolstack issuing hypercalls from dom0.
>>>>
>>>> I am asking about (non-privileged) guest itself calling SCHEDOP_shutdown.
>>> The hypervisor ends up calling:
>>> __domain_finalise_shutdown which sends an VIRQ_DOM_EXC to dom0 which
>>> makes the toolstack do all of those operations.
>> OK. But the I don't see anyone checking that 'reason' (or
>> 'shutdown_code') is SHUTDOWN_soft_reset. In other words, the guest can
>> do 'xen_reboot(23)' or 'xen_reboot(154)'. Or, it seems, even
>> 'xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_reboot)'? The only value it shouldn't be is
>> SHUTDOWN_suspend.
> Xen hypervisor doesn't analyzie the reason, it is being analyzed by the
> toolstack (XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo returns this info encoded in flags
> with XEN_DOMINF_shutdownshift shift).
Thanks.
My problem was that I didn't realize that toolstack generates macros for
shutdown reasons from libxl_types.idl and I couldn't see who looks for
SHUTDOWN_soft_reset.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 9:59 [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: add soft reset on kexec/kdump support Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-25 13:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 15:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 16:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-25 17:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 19:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 19:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-25 19:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-25 21:00 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-09-29 11:39 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-09-29 13:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-09-28 14:16 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560A8D63.5010302@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox