From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>, <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
<linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:56:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560AA686.4010109@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929114517.GA3534@pd.tnic>
On 9/29/2015 6:45 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> @@ -216,12 +223,17 @@ static int set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
>>
>> if (pvt->fam == 0xf)
>> min_scrubrate = 0x0;
>> + else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
>> + min_scrubrate = 0x6;
>>
>> /* Erratum #505 */
>> if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
>> f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>>
>> - return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
>> + if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
>> + return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);
>> +
>> + return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);
> This looks sloppy:
>
> if (condition)
> return function()
> return function()
>
> I ended up committing the version below. Other two applied too.
>
Forgot to remove that conditional :|
Thanks for cleaning it up.
-Aravind.
>
>
> + if (pvt->fam == 0x15) {
> + /* Erratum #505 */
> + if (pvt->model < 0x10)
> + f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>
> - return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
> + if (pvt->model == 0x60)
> + min_scrubrate = 0x6;
> + }
> + return __set_scrub_rate(pvt, bw, min_scrubrate);
> }
>
> static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> @@ -230,11 +241,15 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> u32 scrubval = 0;
> int i, retval = -EINVAL;
>
>
> + if (pvt->fam == 0x15) {
> + /* Erratum #505 */
> + if (pvt->model < 0x10)
> + f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>
> - amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
> + if (pvt->model == 0x60)
> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
> + } else
> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
>
> scrubval = scrubval & 0x001F;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 11:43 [PATCH V2 0/3] Updates to amd64_edac Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-28 11:43 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-09-29 11:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-09-29 14:56 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-09-28 11:43 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Update copyright and remove changelog Aravind Gopalakrishnan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560AA686.4010109@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox