From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754657AbbI3Val (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:30:41 -0400
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:32442 "EHLO
	aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752734AbbI3Vai (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:30:38 -0400
Message-ID: <560C5469.5010704@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:30:17 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>, willy@linux.intel.com
CC: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs: out of bounds on stack in iov_iter_advance
References: <55CB5484.6080000@oracle.com> <20150815161338.4ea210ff@as> <55D1A6D4.3080605@gmail.com> <20150819054650.GD18890@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <55FB75D0.7060403@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <55FB75D0.7060403@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 09/17/2015 10:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 01:46 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>>> or mapping->a_ops->direct_IO() returned more
>>>> than 'count'.
>> 	Was there DAX involved?  ->direct_IO() in there is blkdev_direct_IO(),
>> which takes rather different paths in those cases...
>>
> 
> So I've traced this all the way back to dax_io(). I can trigger this with:
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 93bf2f9..2cdb8a5 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
>         if (need_wmb)
>                 wmb_pmem();
> 
> +       WARN_ON((pos == start) && (pos - start > iov_iter_count(iter)));
>         return (pos == start) ? retval : pos - start;
>  }
> 
> So it seems that iter gets moved twice here: once in dax_io(), and once again
> back at generic_file_read_iter().
> 
> I don't see how it ever worked. Am I missing something?

Ping?


Thanks,
Sasha