From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756586AbbJAQTZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:19:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40950 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbbJAQTW (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:19:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU fw_cfg DMA interface To: Eric Blake , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc_Mar=c3=ad?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, seabios@seabios.org References: <1443701677-13629-1-git-send-email-markmb@redhat.com> <560D5945.5050700@redhat.com> <560D5B1B.10104@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Drew , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Alexander Graf , "Kevin O'Connor" , Gerd Hoffmann From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <560D5D05.3070607@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:19:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560D5B1B.10104@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/01/15 18:11, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/01/2015 10:03 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> [meta-comment] >> >> On 10/01/2015 06:14 AM, Marc MarĂ­ wrote: >>> Implementation of the FW CFG DMA interface. >> >> The subject line is missing "v4" and "0/7". Also, the cover letter is >> missing a diffstat. That makes it harder to see from the cover letter >> what the rest of the series is about. 'git format-patch/send-email >> --cover-letter' does what you want; you can even 'git config >> format.coverletter=auto' to always include a decent cover letter on any >> multi-patch series. > > Oh, I see - you sent a meta-cover letter (the one I replied to in this > subthread), and then a patch series including a cover letter (the real > 0/7, then 1/7 and friends in-reply-to the 0/7) as a child of the > meta-cover. It's still a bit awkward for tools that expect the 0/7 as > the start of the thread, Yep, the pattern I just described doesn't consider those tools. Is that a bad problem? Maybe the pattern is not so clever then. :) (I'm allowed to say bad things about it, because I "invented" it "independently". :)) > and part of my confusion was caused by > out-of-order mail delivery due to the nongnu.org mail server still > recovering from its mail delays. > Right, those delays are not helping. Thanks Laszlo