From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 21:22:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 21:22:50 -0400 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:37805 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 21:22:48 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Kai Germaschewski , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Strange s390 code in 2.4.19-pre8 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 May 2002 12:19:33 -0400." <20020513121933.A6208@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 11:22:11 +1000 Message-ID: <5610.1021339331@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 May 2002 12:19:33 -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote: >It would work if EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS were involved. EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS should only be used when the symbol is used in assembler. Asm code does not get the modversion name mangling. If you have to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_NOVERS for symbols in C code there is almost ceratinly something wrong.