linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <felipe.franciosi@citrix.com>,
	<axboe@fb.com>, <hch@infradead.org>, <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	<rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	<jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:13:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56128587.7000804@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441456782-31318-6-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com>

El 05/09/15 a les 14.39, Bob Liu ha escrit:
> The per device io_lock became a coarser grained lock after multi-queues/rings
> was introduced, this patch converts it to a fine-grained per ring lock.
> 
> NOTE: The per dev_info structure was no more protected by any lock.

I would rewrite this as:

Note that the per-device blkfront_dev_info structure is no longer
protected by any lock.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index bf45c99..1cae76b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_ring_page_order, "Maximum order of pages to be used for the
>  struct blkfront_ring_info
>  {
>  	struct blkif_front_ring ring;
> +	spinlock_t ring_lock;
>  	unsigned int ring_ref[XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGES];
>  	unsigned int evtchn, irq;
>  	struct work_struct work;
> @@ -141,7 +142,6 @@ struct blkfront_ring_info
>   * putting all kinds of interesting stuff here :-)
>   */
>  struct blkfront_dev_info {
> -	spinlock_t io_lock;
>  	struct mutex mutex;
>  	struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
>  	struct gendisk *gd;
> @@ -637,29 +637,28 @@ static int blkif_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  			   const struct blk_mq_queue_data *qd)
>  {
>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = (struct blkfront_ring_info *)hctx->driver_data;
> -	struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo = rinfo->dinfo;
>  
>  	blk_mq_start_request(qd->rq);
> -	spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	if (RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
>  		goto out_busy;
>  
> -	if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, dinfo))
> +	if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, rinfo->dinfo))
>  		goto out_err;
>  
>  	if (blkif_queue_request(qd->rq, rinfo))
>  		goto out_busy;
>  
>  	flush_requests(rinfo);
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
>  
>  out_err:
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR;
>  
>  out_busy:
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY;
>  }
> @@ -961,7 +960,7 @@ static void xlvbd_release_gendisk(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>  	dinfo->gd = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -/* Must be called with io_lock holded */
> +/* Must be called with ring_lock holded */
                                    ^ held.
>  static void kick_pending_request_queues(struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo)
>  {
>  	if (!RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
> @@ -972,10 +971,10 @@ static void blkif_restart_queue(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = container_of(work, struct blkfront_ring_info, work);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	if (rinfo->dinfo->connected == BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED)
>  		kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);

This seems wrong, why are you acquiring a per-ring lock in order to
check a per-device field? IMHO, I think you need to introduce a
per-device lock or drop the locking around this chunk if it's really not
needed.

> -	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo, int suspend)
> @@ -986,7 +985,6 @@ static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo, int suspend)
>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo;
>  
>  	/* Prevent new requests being issued until we fix things up. */
> -	spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>  	dinfo->connected = suspend ?
>  		BLKIF_STATE_SUSPENDED : BLKIF_STATE_DISCONNECTED;
>  	/* No more blkif_request(). */
> @@ -996,6 +994,7 @@ static void blkif_free(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo, int suspend)
>  	for (r_index = 0; r_index < dinfo->nr_rings; r_index++) {
>  		rinfo = &dinfo->rinfo[r_index];
>  
> +		spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  		/* Remove all persistent grants */
>  		if (!list_empty(&rinfo->grants)) {
>  			list_for_each_entry_safe(persistent_gnt, n,
> @@ -1071,7 +1070,7 @@ free_shadow:
>  
>  		/* No more gnttab callback work. */
>  		gnttab_cancel_free_callback(&rinfo->callback);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  
>  		/* Flush gnttab callback work. Must be done with no locks held. */
>  		flush_work(&rinfo->work);
> @@ -1180,13 +1179,10 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = (struct blkfront_ring_info *)dev_id;
>  	struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo = rinfo->dinfo;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&dinfo->io_lock, flags);
> -
> -	if (unlikely(dinfo->connected != BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED)) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dinfo->io_lock, flags);
> +	if (unlikely(dinfo->connected != BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED))
>  		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -	}
>  
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&rinfo->ring_lock, flags);
>   again:
>  	rp = rinfo->ring.sring->rsp_prod;
>  	rmb(); /* Ensure we see queued responses up to 'rp'. */
> @@ -1279,7 +1275,7 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  
>  	kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);
>  
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dinfo->io_lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rinfo->ring_lock, flags);
>  
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
> @@ -1534,7 +1530,6 @@ static int blkfront_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_init(&dinfo->mutex);
> -	spin_lock_init(&dinfo->io_lock);
>  	dinfo->xbdev = dev;
>  	dinfo->vdevice = vdevice;
>  	dinfo->connected = BLKIF_STATE_DISCONNECTED;
> @@ -1550,6 +1545,7 @@ static int blkfront_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>  	for (r_index = 0; r_index < dinfo->nr_rings; r_index++) {
>  		rinfo = &dinfo->rinfo[r_index];
>  
> +		spin_lock_init(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rinfo->grants);
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rinfo->indirect_pages);
>  		rinfo->persistent_gnts_c = 0;
> @@ -1650,16 +1646,16 @@ static int blkif_recover(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>  
>  	xenbus_switch_state(dinfo->xbdev, XenbusStateConnected);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
> -
>  	/* Now safe for us to use the shared ring */
>  	dinfo->connected = BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED;
>  
>  	for (r_index = 0; r_index < dinfo->nr_rings; r_index++) {
>  		rinfo = &dinfo->rinfo[r_index];
>  
> +		spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  		/* Kick any other new requests queued since we resumed */
>  		kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, n, &requests, queuelist) {
> @@ -1668,7 +1664,6 @@ static int blkif_recover(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>  		BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments > segs);
>  		blk_mq_requeue_request(req);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>  	blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(dinfo->rq);
>  
>  	while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&bio_list)) != NULL) {
> @@ -2049,13 +2044,14 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>  	xenbus_switch_state(dinfo->xbdev, XenbusStateConnected);
>  
>  	/* Kick pending requests. */
> -	spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>  	dinfo->connected = BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED;
>  	for (i = 0; i < dinfo->nr_rings; i++) {
>  		rinfo = &dinfo->rinfo[i];
> +
> +		spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  		kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>  
>  	add_disk(dinfo->gd);
>  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-05 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-05 12:39 [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xen-blkfront: convert to blk-mq APIs Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 21:12     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-02 16:04   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 16:12     ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2015-10-02 16:22       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 23:55         ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xen/blkfront: separate per ring information out of device info Bob Liu
2015-10-02 17:02   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-03  0:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:17       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-10  8:30     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:42       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xen/blkfront: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 10:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:28     ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:13   ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2015-10-07 10:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xen/blkfront: negotiate the number of hw queues/rings with backend Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:40   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:39     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:46       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 12:19         ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:41     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-10  4:08     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:36       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19 10:03         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/blkback: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:50     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:49       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xen/blkback: get number of hardware queues/rings from blkfront Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:54     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Rafal Mielniczuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56128587.7000804@citrix.com \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).