From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752730AbbJFSQ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:16:28 -0400 Received: from mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.63]:54090 "EHLO mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752285AbbJFSQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:16:27 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,644,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="76941138" Message-ID: <56140FE6.9030604@broadcom.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:16:06 -0700 From: Florian Fainelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Fainelli , Thierry Reding CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] pwm: Broadcom BCM7038 PWM controller (v4) References: <1442274426-3507-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20151005151415.GE27759@ulmo> <56140F83.2050909@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56140F83.2050909@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/10/15 11:14, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 05/10/15 08:14, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:47:04PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patch series add PWM support for the Broadcom BCM7xxx >>> chips which feature one or more PWM controllers capable of >>> output periods from 148ns to ~622ms using a combination of >>> variable and fixed frequency settings. >>> >>> The controller does not support setting a polarity. >>> >>> This is based on Thierry's pwm/next branch. >>> >>> Florian Fainelli (2): >>> Documentation: dt: add Broadcom BCM7038 PWM controller binding >>> pwm: Add Broadcom BCM7038 PWM controller support >> >> I've applied both of these patches with a couple of stylistic changes. > > Thanks but: > > 1) you dropped the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE while doing so which is useful > for auto-loading OF modules > 2) you introduced a build failure in the CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > There was a patch just submitted for 2), but I can submit an incremental > for 1) maybe? Disregard that, brainfart on my side, was diffing branches backwards... oh well. -- Florian