From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
felipe.franciosi@citrix.com, axboe@fb.com, hch@infradead.org,
avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jonathan.davies@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:34:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614F51E.1020404@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56128587.7000804@citrix.com>
On 10/05/2015 10:13 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 05/09/15 a les 14.39, Bob Liu ha escrit:
>> The per device io_lock became a coarser grained lock after multi-queues/rings
>> was introduced, this patch converts it to a fine-grained per ring lock.
>>
>> NOTE: The per dev_info structure was no more protected by any lock.
>
> I would rewrite this as:
>
> Note that the per-device blkfront_dev_info structure is no longer
> protected by any lock.
>
Will update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> index bf45c99..1cae76b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_ring_page_order, "Maximum order of pages to be used for the
>> struct blkfront_ring_info
>> {
>> struct blkif_front_ring ring;
>> + spinlock_t ring_lock;
>> unsigned int ring_ref[XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGES];
>> unsigned int evtchn, irq;
>> struct work_struct work;
>> @@ -141,7 +142,6 @@ struct blkfront_ring_info
>> * putting all kinds of interesting stuff here :-)
>> */
>> struct blkfront_dev_info {
>> - spinlock_t io_lock;
>> struct mutex mutex;
>> struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
>> struct gendisk *gd;
>> @@ -637,29 +637,28 @@ static int blkif_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>> const struct blk_mq_queue_data *qd)
>> {
>> struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = (struct blkfront_ring_info *)hctx->driver_data;
>> - struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo = rinfo->dinfo;
>>
>> blk_mq_start_request(qd->rq);
>> - spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> if (RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
>> goto out_busy;
>>
>> - if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, dinfo))
>> + if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, rinfo->dinfo))
>> goto out_err;
>>
>> if (blkif_queue_request(qd->rq, rinfo))
>> goto out_busy;
>>
>> flush_requests(rinfo);
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
>>
>> out_err:
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR;
>>
>> out_busy:
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
>> return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY;
>> }
>> @@ -961,7 +960,7 @@ static void xlvbd_release_gendisk(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>> dinfo->gd = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> -/* Must be called with io_lock holded */
>> +/* Must be called with ring_lock holded */
> ^ held.
>> static void kick_pending_request_queues(struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo)
>> {
>> if (!RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
>> @@ -972,10 +971,10 @@ static void blkif_restart_queue(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = container_of(work, struct blkfront_ring_info, work);
>>
>> - spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> if (rinfo->dinfo->connected == BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED)
>> kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);
>
> This seems wrong, why are you acquiring a per-ring lock in order to
> check a per-device field? IMHO, I think you need to introduce a
> per-device lock or drop the locking around this chunk if it's really not
> needed.
>
The lock here is to protect kick_pending_request_queues() where we will check RING_FULL().
Will move this lock after the checking of per-device field.
Thanks,
-Bob
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-05 12:39 [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xen-blkfront: convert to blk-mq APIs Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 21:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-02 16:04 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 16:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2015-10-02 16:22 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 23:55 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xen/blkfront: separate per ring information out of device info Bob Liu
2015-10-02 17:02 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-03 0:34 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-10 8:30 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19 9:42 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xen/blkfront: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 10:52 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:28 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:13 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:34 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xen/blkfront: negotiate the number of hw queues/rings with backend Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:39 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:46 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 12:19 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:41 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-10 4:08 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19 9:36 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19 10:03 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/blkback: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:50 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xen/blkback: get number of hardware queues/rings from blkfront Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:54 ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02 9:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Rafal Mielniczuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5614F51E.1020404@oracle.com \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).