From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756000AbbJHLoE (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 07:44:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:35237 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753416AbbJHLoA (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 07:44:00 -0400 Message-ID: <56165701.90402@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 19:44:01 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kernel test robot , Al Stone CC: lkp@01.org, LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 References: <871td6xcxc.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <871td6xcxc.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/08/2015 11:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > FYI, we noticed the below changes on > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > commit 7494b07ebaae2117629024369365f7be7adc16c3 ("ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro") > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: undefined MADT subtable type for FADT 4.0: 127 (length 12) Seems that the MADT table contains reserved subtable type (0x7F), so this is traded as a wrong type in our patch. > [ 0.000000] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC address override entry This was called by early_acpi_parse_madt_lapic_addr_ovr() in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, which is scanning MADT for the first time when booting, so it will fail the boot process when finding the reserved MADT subtable type. > [ 0.000000] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI As the spec said in Table 5-46 (ACPI 6.0): 0x10-0x7F Reserved. OSPM skips structures of the reserved type. Should we just ignore those reserved type when scanning the MADT table? In the patch "ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro", we just trade it as wrong, that's why we failed to boot the system. Thanks Hanjun