From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] sched/completion: convert completions to use simple wait queues
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:03:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561B855A.2060403@bmw-carit.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561B7A9A.3020904@bmw-carit.de>
On 10/12/2015 11:17 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 04:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:05:29PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> @@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ void complete_all(struct completion *x)
>>> {
>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>
>>> - spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>>> x->done += UINT_MAX/2;
>>> - __wake_up_locked(&x->wait, TASK_NORMAL, 0);
>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>>> + swake_up_locked(&x->wait);
>>> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete_all);
>>
>> I don't think that's correct; __wake_up_locked(.nr=0) would wake all
>> waiters, where swake_up_locked() will only wake one.
>
> I read that x->done should be protected via wait.lock during the whole
> operation. swake_up_all() will release and reacquire the lock while
> processing the all waiters. So we need to get
>
> Could we play a trick like setting the highest bit in done for
> indicating the complete_all() operation. The UINT_MAX/2 update looks
> like do this by setting a value which has the biggest offset from 0 (but
> why adding instead of just going for assigning...).
I had something like this here in mind:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/completion.c b/kernel/sched/completion.c
index b020159..c03d4de 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/completion.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
+#define COMPLETION_DONE_ALL (1UL << 31)
+#define COMPLETION_DONE_MASK (COMPLETION_DONE_ALL - 1)
+
/**
* complete: - signals a single thread waiting on this completion
* @x: holds the state of this particular completion
@@ -31,7 +34,7 @@ void complete(struct completion *x)
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
- x->done++;
+ x->done = (x->done + 1) & COMPLETION_DONE_MASK;
swake_up_locked(&x->wait);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
}
@@ -51,9 +54,9 @@ void complete_all(struct completion *x)
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
- x->done += UINT_MAX/2;
- swake_up_locked(&x->wait);
+ x->done |= COMPLETION_DONE_ALL;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
+ swake_up_all(&x->wait);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete_all);
@@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ do_wait_for_common(struct completion *x,
if (!x->done)
return timeout;
}
- x->done--;
+ x->done = (x->done - 1) & COMPLETION_DONE_MASK;
return timeout ?: 1;
}
@@ -281,7 +284,7 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct completion *x)
if (!x->done)
ret = 0;
else
- x->done--;
+ x->done = (x->done - 1) & COMPLETION_DONE_MASK;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&x->wait.lock, flags);
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-09 12:05 [PATCH v0 0/8] Simple wait queue support Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] sched/completion: convert completions to use simple wait queues Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 9:17 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-10-12 10:03 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2015-10-12 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 12:44 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] rcu: Do not call swake_up_all with rnp->lock holding Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] gadgetfs: Fix fallout of wait to swait completion change Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] usb: gadget: f_fs: " Daniel Wagner
2015-09-09 12:05 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] orinoco_usb: " Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561B855A.2060403@bmw-carit.de \
--to=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox