From: Bhuvanchandra <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <jic23@kernel.org>,
<maitysanchayan@gmail.com>, <B38611@freescale.com>,
<knaack.h@gmx.de>, <lars@metafoo.de>, <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
<shawn.guo@linaro.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:07:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561C7C93.4090608@toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b977c21c414aef0c250755c9d772ead@agner.ch>
Hi Stefan,
Sorry! for the delay.
On 10/08/2015 11:46 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Bhuvan,
>
> On 2015-09-23 06:43, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> There is an observed temperature difference of ~20°C with the
>> internal temperature reading and the temperature measured on
>> SoC package. Existing calculations consider the typical values
>> provided in datasheet. Those typical values are valid for
>> VREFH_ADC at 3.0V. Voltage at 25°C is different for different
>> VREFH_ADC voltages. With VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, voltage at 25°C is
>> 0.699V. Hence update the VTEMP25 to 0.699V which gives ADCR@Temp25
>> as 867 and the final temperature readings differs with ~5°C from
>> the external readings.
> I am not entirely happy with the message. The proposed changes seem not
> to alter the offset which would explain a ~20°C difference... Where do
> this 20°C come from?
The ~20°C difference is observed at higher temperatures when VTEMP25
at VREDH_ADC of 3V0 is considered. Will update the comment according
to the updated VTEMP25 constant instead of the 20°C difference which
is confusing wrt the changes done here.
Best regards,
Bhuvan
> --
> Stefan
>
>> Formula for finding ADCR@Temp25:
>> ADCR@Temp25 = (ADCR@Vdd * V@TEMP25 * 10) / VDDconv
>>
>> ADCR@Vdd for 12-Bit ADC = 4095
>> VDDconv = VREFH_ADC * 10
>>
>> VREFH_ADC@3.3V
>> ADCR@Temp25 = (4095 * .699 * 10) / 33
>> ADCR@Temp25 ~= 867
>>
>> | VREFH_ADC | V@TEMP25 | VDDconv | ADCR@Temp25 |
>> | 3.0V | 0.696mV | 30 | 950 |
>> | 3.3V | 0.699mV | 33 | 867 |
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV<bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
>> index f4df2a7..e7abc13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@
>>
>> #define DEFAULT_SAMPLE_TIME 1000
>>
>> +/* V at 25°C of 696 mV */
>> +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V0 950
>> +/* V at 25°C of 699 mV */
>> +#define VF610_VTEMP25_3V3 867
>> +/* Typical sensor slope coefficient at all temperatures */
>> +#define VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF 1840
>> +
>> enum clk_sel {
>> VF610_ADCIOC_BUSCLK_SET,
>> VF610_ADCIOC_ALTCLK_SET,
>> @@ -636,11 +643,13 @@ static int vf610_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> break;
>> case IIO_TEMP:
>> /*
>> - * Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000
>> - * Using sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C and
>> - * V at 25°C of 696 mV
>> - */
>> - *val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - 864) * 1000000 / 1840;
>> + * Calculate in degree Celsius times 1000
>> + * Using the typical sensor slope of 1.84 mV/°C
>> + * and VREFH_ADC at 3.3V, V at 25°C of 699 mV
>> + */
>> + *val = 25000 - ((int)info->value - VF610_VTEMP25_3V3) *
>> + 1000000 / VF610_TEMP_SLOPE_COEFF;
>> +
>> break;
>> default:
>> mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 13:43 [PATCH] vf610_adc: Fix internal temperature calculation Bhuvanchandra DV
2015-09-27 15:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-09-29 4:52 ` Bhuvanchandra
2015-10-08 2:01 ` Duan Andy
2015-10-11 14:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-10-11 14:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-10-08 6:16 ` Stefan Agner
2015-10-13 3:37 ` Bhuvanchandra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561C7C93.4090608@toradex.com \
--to=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
--cc=B38611@freescale.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maitysanchayan@gmail.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox