From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un]mask_irq as default methods
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:21:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561DBC1A.5060902@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444760085-27857-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On 2015/10/14 2:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When we create a generic MSI domain, that MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS
> is set, and that any of .mask or .unmask are NULL in the irq_chip
> structure, we set them to pci_msi_[un]mask_irq.
>
> This is a bad idea for at least two reasons:
> - PCI_MSI might not be selected, kernel fails to build (yes, this is
> legitimate, at least on arm64!)
> - This may not be a PCI/MSI domain at all (platform MSI, for example)
>
> Either way, this looks wrong. Move the overriding of mask/unmask to
> the PCI counterpart, and panic is any of these two methods is not
> set in the core code (they really should be present).
Hi Marc,
Thanks for fixing this,
Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Gerry
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 4 ++++
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 6 +-----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index d449714..4a7da3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -1243,6 +1243,10 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
> BUG_ON(!chip);
> if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
> chip->irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg;
> + if (!chip->irq_mask)
> + chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
> + if (!chip->irq_unmask)
> + chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index 7e6512b..be9149f 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -228,11 +228,7 @@ static void msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
> {
> struct irq_chip *chip = info->chip;
>
> - BUG_ON(!chip);
> - if (!chip->irq_mask)
> - chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
> - if (!chip->irq_unmask)
> - chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
> + BUG_ON(!chip || !chip->irq_mask || !chip->irq_unmask);
> if (!chip->irq_set_affinity)
> chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 18:14 [PATCH] genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un]mask_irq as default methods Marc Zyngier
2015-10-14 2:21 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-10-15 8:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-16 9:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-16 12:18 ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un] mask_irq " tip-bot for Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561DBC1A.5060902@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox