From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:09:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E7027.3070106@list.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014150155.GA21330@gmail.com>
14.10.2015 18:01, Ingo Molnar пишет:
>
> * Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
>
>> On an off-topic: there was recently a patch from you that
>> disables vm86() by mmap_min_addr. I've found that dosemu, when
>> started as root, could override mmap_min_addr. I guess this will
>> no longer work, right? Not a big regression, just something to
>> know and document.
>
> So I think it should still work, because we check for mmap_min_addr in the system
> call itself:
>
> static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus)
> {
> ...
> err = security_mmap_addr(0);
> if (err) {
> /*
>
> So if dosemu first tweaks mmap_min_addr, the syscall should succeed.
No, it doesn't tweak it.
It just seems that root is allowed to do mmap(0, MAP_FIXED)
_regardless_ of mmap_min_addr. But it would be crazy to run vm86() as
root to also bypass the check (dosemu drops privs earlier), so I guess
this trick will stop working.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 1:04 [RFC 0/4] x86: sigcontext SS fixes, take 2 Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-13 1:04 ` [RFC 1/4] x86/signal/64: Add a comment about sigcontext->fs and gs Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-13 1:04 ` [RFC 2/4] x86/signal/64: Fix SS if needed when delivering a 64-bit signal Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-13 1:04 ` [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit signal context Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-13 14:59 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-14 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-14 15:09 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]
2015-10-14 16:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-14 17:40 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-14 18:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-14 18:34 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-14 18:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-14 21:37 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-14 21:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-18 13:36 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-18 16:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-18 16:29 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-18 16:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-18 16:43 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-18 17:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-14 16:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-10-14 16:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-14 16:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-10-14 16:57 ` Stas Sergeev
2015-10-14 17:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2015-10-13 1:04 ` [RFC 4/4] selftests/x86: Add tests for UC_SIGCONTEXT_SS and UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561E7027.3070106@list.ru \
--to=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox