From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, wim@iguana.be, javier@osg.samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] watchdog: Compile possible drivers with COMPILE_TEST
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:40:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561ED9E6.8070600@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561ED31C.7090605@osg.samsung.com>
On 10/14/2015 03:11 PM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On 14/10/15 22:35, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 10/14/2015 11:55 AM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>>> These drivers have depends that aren't build dependencies, so it's
>>> a good idea to allow these drivers to always be built when the
>>> COMPILE_TEST option is enabled.
>>>
>>> That way, the drivers can be built with a config generated by make
>>> allyesconfig and check if a patch would break the build.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> What architectures have you actually tested this for ?
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>
> I've compiled it in x86 and then I tried ARM
> (with CROSS_COMPILE="ccache arm-linux-gnueabihf-" ARCH=arm)
>
> But ARM kept failing due to other drivers, first Lustre then an Ethernet
> driver (I40E), and more.
>
arm:allmodconfig should build fine. Either case, you can always run "make -i"
to ignore errors, to ensure that you at least don't introduce new problems.
> Is there a better way of doing this?
>
Sure, at least run allmodconfig for _all_ architectures, or at least
for the major architectures.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 18:55 [PATCH v2] watchdog: Compile possible drivers with COMPILE_TEST Luis de Bethencourt
2015-10-14 21:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-10-14 22:11 ` Luis de Bethencourt
2015-10-14 22:40 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-10-15 2:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-16 13:05 ` Luis de Bethencourt
2015-10-16 4:11 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561ED9E6.8070600@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luisbg@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox