linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com, steve.capper@linaro.org,
	ryan.arnold@linaro.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edward.nevill@linaro.org,
	aph@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	dave.martin@arm.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/24] arm64: Populate cpuinfo after notify_cpu_starting
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:23:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FA8E7.5020504@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151015105438.GL4239@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 15/10/15 11:54, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:22:21PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> This patch delays populating the cpuinfo for a new (hotplugged)
>> CPU until the notifiers have executed. This will enable us to verify
>> if the new (hotplugged) CPU has all the capabilities which the system
>> already has. If it doesn't, we could prevent it from turning online and
>> also modifying the system wide feature register status.
>
> Just a question here: do we expect the notifiers to enable certain
> features that we check later? AFAICT, the checking is done on the
> feature registers which don't change after notifiers,

No. The notifiers are registered only after we compute the cpu
capabilities (at which point all the boot time activated CPUs are
turned on and has updated their cpuinfo). The features won't change
after this point throughout the lifetime of the system. So we don't want to
run the capability check for the 'CPUs' during the normal boot up. It
is only for the hotplug case. We compute the capability based on the
booted CPUs from smp_cpus_done() and then apply the alternatives based
on what we have in common. So the system can function properly with
mismatched features from the CPUs. But if a new CPU is brought online
with at least one missing established capability, we should fail the bring up.

  so we could as
> well block the booting before any notifier is run.
>

Thanks
Suzuki






  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-13 17:22 [PATCH v3 00/24] arm64: Consolidate CPU feature handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] arm64: Make the CPU information more clear Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] arm64: Delay ELF HWCAP initialisation until all CPUs are up Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] arm64: Delay cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] arm64: Move cpu feature detection code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] arm64: Move mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] arm64: Move /proc/cpuinfo handling code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] arm64: Define helper for sys_reg id manipulation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] arm64: Handle width of a cpuid feature Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-15 10:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-15 10:45     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] arm64: Consolidate CPU Sanity check to CPU Feature infrastructure Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] arm64: Read system wide CPUID value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] arm64: Cleanup mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] arm64: Populate cpuinfo after notify_cpu_starting Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-15 10:54   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-15 13:23     ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] arm64: Delay cpu feature capability checks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-17 22:56   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-19  9:41     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] arm64: Make use of system wide " Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] arm64: Cleanup HWCAP handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] arm64: Move FP/ASIMD hwcap handling to common code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] arm64/debug: Make use of the system wide safe value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] arm64/kvm: Make use of the system wide safe values Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] arm64: Documentation - Expose CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] arm64: Add helper to decode register from instruction Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] arm64: cpufeature: Track the user visible fields Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] arm64: Expose feature registers by emulating MRS Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-14  9:03   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-16 15:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/24] arm64: Consolidate CPU feature handling Dave Martin
2015-10-16 15:32   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-16 15:42     ` Dave Martin
2015-10-25  8:06 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2015-10-27 18:09   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-28  8:53     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561FA8E7.5020504@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=edward.nevill@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.arnold@linaro.org \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).