From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753594AbbJOOIF (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:05 -0400
Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:57855 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753234AbbJOOIC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:02 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
References: <20151006193025.GA11826@www.outflux.net>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Samsung Open Source Group
Message-ID: <561FB33F.5030906@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:07:59 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151006193025.GA11826@www.outflux.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
> the test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> v3:
>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
> v2:
>  - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart.
> ---

Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next.
If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1

thanks,
-- Shuah

-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978