From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753684AbbJOPng (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:43:36 -0400 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.243]:48243 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753523AbbJOPne (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:43:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/defconfig: update sama5 defconfig To: Alexandre Belloni , References: <1444824684-24526-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <1444824684-24526-3-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20151015132451.GD3421@piout.net> <20151015153116.GE26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com> CC: , , , From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: atmel Message-ID: <561FC97D.2040806@atmel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:42:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151015153116.GE26893@odux.rfo.atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 15/10/2015 17:31, Ludovic Desroches a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 14/10/2015 at 14:11:24 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote : >>> Add SAMA5D2 SoC plus Atmel flexcom and Atmel sdhci devices. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches >>> --- >>> arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig | 6 +++++- >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> It is probably worth updating the multi_v7_defconfig too (in a separate >> patch). >> > > Maybe I have to send a whole defconfig update . I mean when you do > savedefconfig, you have more changes. I won't send each one separately. I > have kept changes which were in relation with the stuff I had. > > Or I can send a defconfig update from the savedefconfig and then add > sama5d2, flexcom and sdhci. Actually you can do this for our own AT91 defconfigs. For the multi_v7_defconfig I would recommend to simply make a patch with our updates and let the arm-soc maintainer merge it with their current one: I mean, they will manage the conflicts on this file anyway and the changes to this file will not be part of one or our pull-requests but a patch that they will handle separately: so no need to add more update than the strictly needed ones on our end. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre