From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FD6F3.4090209@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444907357-13114-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Hi Luca,
On 15/10/15 12:09, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Commit 9d5142624256 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by
> eliminating locking of non-feasible target") broke select_task_rq_dl()
> and find_lock_later_rq(), because it introduced a comparison between
> the local task's deadline and dl.earliest_dl.curr of the remote queue.
> However, if the remote runqueue does not contain any SCHED_DEADLINE
> task its earliest_dl.curr is 0 (always smaller than the deadline of
> the local task) and the remote runqueue is not selected for pushing.
> As a result, if an application creates multiple SCHED_DEADLINE threads,
> they will never be pushed to runqueues that do not already contain
> SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
> This patches fixes the issue by checking if dl.earliest_dl.curr == 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index fc8f010..0d86d60 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
> int target = find_later_rq(p);
>
> if (target != -1 &&
> - dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
> - cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr))
> + (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
> + cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr) ||
> + (cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr == 0)))
Can't we actually use dl.dl_nr_running here and below, so
that we won't incur any wraparound problem?
Thanks,
- Juri
> cpu = target;
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> @@ -1417,7 +1418,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
>
> later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>
> - if (!dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline,
> + if (later_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr &&
> + !dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline,
> later_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) {
> /*
> * Target rq has tasks of equal or earlier deadline,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-15 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 11:09 [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks Luca Abeni
2015-10-15 16:40 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2015-10-15 20:10 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:03 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:51 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561FD6F3.4090209@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox