From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"open list : PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list : USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Drake <drake@endlessos.org>, Gary Li <Gary.Li@amd.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: Verify functions currently in D3cold have entered D0
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:07:10 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561b6865-cba3-d640-b56d-072d06b94026@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240823042508.1057791-5-superm1@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2453 bytes --]
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>
> It is reported that USB4 routers and downstream devices may behave
> incorrectly if a dock cable is plugged in at approximately the time that
> the autosuspend_delay is configured. In this situation the device has
> attempted to enter D3cold, but didn't finish D3cold entry when the PCI
> core tried to transition it back to D0.
>
> Empirically measuring this situation an "aborted" D3cold exit takes
> ~60ms and a "normal" D3cold exit takes ~6ms.
>
> The PCI-PM 1.2 spec specifies that the restore time for functions
> in D3cold is either 'Full context restore or boot latency'.
>
> As PCIe r6.0 sec 5.8 specifies that the device will have gone
> through a conventional reset, it may take some time for the
> device to be ready.
>
> Wait up to 1 sec as specified in PCIe r6.0 sec 6.6.1 for a device
> in D3cold to return to D0.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index b7717155e2fd0..7e861b6923d0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1425,6 +1425,17 @@ int pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev)
> else if (state == PCI_D2)
> udelay(PCI_PM_D2_DELAY);
>
> + /*
> + * D3cold -> D0 will have gone through a conventional reset and may need
> + * time to be ready.
> + */
> + if (dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pci_dev_wait(dev, PCI_DEV_WAIT_D3COLD_D0, PCI_RESET_WAIT);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> end:
> dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
> if (need_restore)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 477257e843952..a675f5d55f298 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ enum pci_reset_type {
> PCI_DEV_WAIT_BUS_RESET,
> PCI_DEV_WAIT_RESUME,
> PCI_DEV_WAIT_DPC,
> + PCI_DEV_WAIT_D3COLD_D0,
Don't you need to add a string for this too? :-/
I wonder if it would be prudent to add PCI_DEV_WAIT_MAX and
use static_assert() for the sizeof the pci_reset_types[] in patch 1 to
autodetect mismatch (though it won't help if something is added in the
middle of the list).
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 4:25 [PATCH v4 0/5] Verify devices transition from D3cold to D0 Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Use an enum for reset type in pci_dev_wait() Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 11:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use rdtsc_ordered() when RDTSCP or LFENCE_RDTSC are supported Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 4:29 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-25 12:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-25 12:37 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: Check PCI_PM_CTRL instead of PCI_COMMAND in pci_dev_wait() Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 12:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: Verify functions currently in D3cold have entered D0 Mario Limonciello
2024-08-23 12:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: Allow Ryzen XHCI controllers into D3cold and drop delays Mario Limonciello
2024-08-24 1:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-23 4:25 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PCI: Drop Radeon quirk for Macbook Pro 8.2 Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561b6865-cba3-d640-b56d-072d06b94026@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Gary.Li@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=drake@endlessos.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox