From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753311AbbJPGcn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 02:32:43 -0400 Received: from mail.bmw-carit.de ([62.245.222.98]:39105 "EHLO mail.bmw-carit.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997AbbJPGcm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 02:32:42 -0400 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0204.56209A01.00C8,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation To: kbuild test robot References: <201510161338.lC9uNMDr%fengguang.wu@intel.com> CC: , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Paul Gortmaker , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Daniel Wagner X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <562099FF.6050003@bmw-carit.de> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:32:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201510161338.lC9uNMDr%fengguang.wu@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/16/2015 07:46 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Peter, > > [auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc5 -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Wagner/Simple-wait-queue-support/20151014-154944 > config: mips-nlm_xlp_defconfig (attached as .config) > reproduce: > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=mips > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> mips-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/.tmp_swait.o: warning: Inconsistent ISA between e_flags and .MIPS.abiflags I tried to do trigger this warning on my local machine using the above steps. Neither 4.9.0 nor 4.6.3 version of the cross tool gcc was showing this. To the warning itself. I have no idea what this is about. Any ideas? thanks, daniel