From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:51:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5620BAA5.5010807@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5620AF64.4050208@unitn.it>
Hi,
On 16/10/15 09:03, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:40 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> On 15/10/15 12:09, Luca Abeni wrote:
>>> Commit 9d5142624256 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by
>>> eliminating locking of non-feasible target") broke select_task_rq_dl()
> [...]
>>> - dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
>>> - cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr))
>>> + (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline,
>>> + cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr) ||
>>> + (cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr == 0)))
>>
>> Can't we actually use dl.dl_nr_running here and below, so
>> that we won't incur any wraparound problem?
> Ok, I tested the patch with dl.dl_nr_running and if works for me...
>
> I am going to send the updated patch in few minutes.
>
Thanks!
> BTW, should we also use "dl_rq->dl_nr_running == 0" instead of
> "dl_rq->earliest_dl.curr == 0" in inc_dl_deadline(), and remove the
> comment from init_dl_rq()? If you think it is a good idea, I'll test this
> additional change and send a patch in next week.
>
Yeah, it seems we need that fix too.
Best,
- Juri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-16 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 11:09 [PATCH] Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks Luca Abeni
2015-10-15 16:40 ` Juri Lelli
2015-10-15 20:10 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:03 ` Luca Abeni
2015-10-16 8:51 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5620BAA5.5010807@arm.com \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox