From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753391AbbJPJlF (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:41:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:49838 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752703AbbJPJlD (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:41:03 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,688,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="306909769" Message-ID: <5620C62B.4000001@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:40:59 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wei Liu , Insu Yun CC: Yeongjin Jang , Taesoo Kim , Ian Campbell , , "Yun, Insu" , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: correctly check failed allocation References: <1444932148-15633-1-git-send-email-wuninsu@gmail.com> <20151016090521.GJ32638@zion.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <20151016090521.GJ32638@zion.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16/10/15 10:05, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:02:47PM -0400, Insu Yun wrote: >> I changed patch with valid format. >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Insu Yun wrote: >> >>> Since vzalloc can be failed in memory pressure, >>> writes -ENOMEM to xenstore to indicate error. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Insu Yun >>> --- >>> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >>> b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >>> index 929a6e7..56ebd82 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >>> @@ -788,6 +788,12 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) >>> /* Use the number of queues requested by the frontend */ >>> be->vif->queues = vzalloc(requested_num_queues * >>> sizeof(struct xenvif_queue)); >>> + if (!be->vif->queues) { >>> + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -ENOMEM, >>> + "allocating queues"); >>> + return; >>> >> >> I didn't use goto err, because another error handling is not required >> > > It's recommended in kernel coding style to use "goto" style error > handling. I personally prefer that to arbitrary return in function body, > too. > > It's not a matter of whether another error handling is required or not, > it's about cleaner code that is easy to reason about and consistent > coding style. Using xenbus_dev_fatal(); return; throughout would be consistent and easy to reason about. Also, the goto err path should raise a fatal error (instead of disconnecting). I also note that failures in the xen_net_read_rate(), xen_register_watchers() and read_xenbus_vif_flags() are also not handled. David