From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752928AbbJRJ4B (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 05:56:01 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:63131 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752035AbbJRJz7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 05:55:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: improve and extend ifnullfree To: Julia Lawall References: <1445102605-22408-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Cc: Fabian Frederick , Gilles Muller , Michal Marek , Nicolas Palix , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56236C9A.8060906@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:55:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1445102605-22408-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aPY3aSbQJiLQ30P6mIolN09mHsYh0aqYHk39lrWli63BlNYHIq+ InXUWE5hSxeQqq54+gp5wNnVjDWQtC5TEHNqlyl5NAvDgl8FCf3mwUZHBB9cSX+MSdKsd/T oIAksE4zwLCYepD2G1Jfm/t6sQFNJoynby3TaLbbdSChX+RqKZIV6zEovLr0E9TtHMrfMTn KBXvfpzG99JTzLCkXo0yA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/286FlUKYs0=:tHgyGJAICwS2P36o1semzR RjAIyUcfdnIFADMCpM9nxJlgDJSY7ZPF3iR1G5oaWZnF1zdKW2Wm+1NsLrg0ie9kb+08pdh/0 pVczeU1cr9J40sk05TFymQP3MyhLSo9LrhV18FRLSS8Sz6WbsbbloO6dEroQf3tUnX0S4OJi0 G/0razHPsHSlQeHPhRyemTrcmBQN8KyKOtRLiMB9op+ubfxBxHB8L23wyOHQAINFIInHm0RyV vww52m1eAnx8HztXkjEpAUuBiwo9b0rhekWNuCWKZ/w1njAdTjzZp6dIQ8NN85YFfqsBVSqHT wg/MTCYLGROUdIOOKjXRSMoQAtApzpAtPHkl8YNpMGriGTe3J3a8qhX7tDy8viBVG9DWpuMoX hLfVcSOllI0v5KUQYb9XML2B7ODf2P5pTsjTJ6e93QjYU9PhNsGqsUZqm6F6EwS2BxzoE1ZWf jFqKSUGB75fckDXC+8A7/2z1+9w7Z5JWt9PTc1alC6Q79P452dmpvrPiPaVB006oy1I3oyGE+ KRLkIBMKo+6xnDWCQ9O5Dc9XnnOTeChDzCqPEz0+o3fDPuGf5QUt0cp0TI2IE/HdKh9vfFlAr R8kfglW1b82cAfQGgoL3sNemxZaAYraGEuGnyUieXAoPPk0FLFrxnxY/IUMuhFDSmjbXZFMlG SolVe1ZvngG2CKDCj9IdjMaZK2K0eiEoh/Sl5eSnWYCYm4twJ2hIk4DcnaEWMYUtwQ6lzG4nr 4BLH9NFk7lmQhk1L/2X+q9h5IZ5KRUx4GVu1n5jBlC42MAOJO0TJasg9Up2oVFapZc4gMC2Fb f5BGmp1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Remove removal and re-addition of freeing functions. I find such a wording confusing for a commit message. > Add position variable on usb_free_urb in the non-patch case. Is it interesting that this fix corresponds to a bug report from 2014-08-09? https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/9/33 https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2014-August/001038.html > @r depends on context || report || org @ > @@ -36,8 +32,8 @@ expression E; > position p; > @@ > > -* if (E) > -* \(kfree@p\|debugfs_remove@p\|debugfs_remove_recursive@p\|usb_free_urb\)(E); > +* if (E != NULL) > +* \(kfree@p\|debugfs_remove@p\|debugfs_remove_recursive@p\|usb_free_urb@p\)(E); How do you think about to extend the shown function name pattern also with suffixes like the following (besides "destroy")? * put * release * unref * unregister Regards, Markus