From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754276AbbJSRil (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:38:41 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51376 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbbJSRik (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:38:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] pm: bf609: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag To: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Steven Miao , "adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <1442850433-5903-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1442850433-5903-12-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <56252A9D.1070505@arm.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1442850433-5903-12-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/09/15 16:47, Sudeep Holla wrote: > The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should > be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the > suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system > from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for > the wakeup. > > This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with > enable_irq_wake instead. > > Cc: Steven Miao Gentle Ping ! -- Regards, Sudeep